Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 84

Thread: 8x10 photography and diffraction

  1. #61
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    A wet plate is ZERO pixels. That's why I like it, slides shows too. Digital projectors were for those really boring Powerpoint presentations at sales meetings before I retired - worse than Aunt Maude showing Kodachrome slides of her vacation to the donut factory in Peoria taken the previous summer.

  2. #62

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    All this text goes back to the question of what is "Art", why Art is IMPORTANT to the human family and human condition.
    Question of 8x10 and Diffraction is just one grain of sand on the beach of expressive image making.


    Bernice

  3. #63

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    north of the 49th
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    question for the those who use 2x sided tape. to remove the sheet, do you simply pop one side out the rail to peel it off the tape, or is there a better method ? also one would want tape with minimal sticktion ?

    tia

    fred
    notch codes ? I only use one film...

  4. #64
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,222

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    I slid a finger under the film and popped it off the tape, then slid out the film as usual. I used a 3M tape that had high tack strength on one side and low on the other.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  5. #65
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    Film sag did you say? Double-side tape. Bob's your uncle.

  6. #66

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    Depending on the thickness of the tap, amount applied and .... lifts up the film altering it's focal point position.
    Adhesive film holders were once a Sinar item. Linhof made a vacuum film folder.

    Just another trade-off.


    Bernice

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew O'Neill View Post
    Film sag did you say? Double-side tape. Bob's your uncle.

  7. #67
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    It has to be the right kind of tape! - 3M no. 9415PC - permanent adhesive on one side, repeatedly repositionable Post-It adhesive on the other side. 9425 has also been successfully used. Both are 2-mil thick. Modifying holders is simple if you have typical plastic Lisco or Fidelity holders. Just take a sharp box knife, a steel straightedge, and slice the film-retaining fin from each side (not the darkslide retainer). Practice on a funky holder first. After your tape strips are carefully placed and permanently pressured down, remove the top liner. Film is carefully aligned to the bottom end position then gently dropped down. It's easy with practice. Be careful not to let dust build up on the adhesive so that it will remain effective over the long run, potentially many years.

  8. #68

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    Quote Originally Posted by Bernice Loui View Post
    Depending on the thickness of the tap, amount applied and .... lifts up the film altering it's focal point position.
    Adhesive film holders were once a Sinar item. Linhof made a vacuum film folder.

    Just another trade-off.


    Bernice
    Been shooting primarily 8x10 for 15 years and never ever have I had a situation where I witnessed or could see in the negative / print the adverse effects of film sag on 8x10 even shooting straight down at an image. Sharp as a tack. Similarly I have never seen a problem with this on 11x14 although I have to admit that I have never taxed the conventional horizontal +/- 20 degrees with he 11x14. Why be concerned about something that by its own implementation could induce a problem with double stick tape?

  9. #69

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,901

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    Try using a Schneider 480mm f4.5 Xenar with a taking aperture of f8 on sheet film 5x7 or larger, then make an enlargement of up to 4x. Then do a close up inspection of less then 12" away and inspection with a 4x loupe magnifier on the print.

    If the taking aperture is f22 and smaller then contact printed a taking aperture of f90 on 8x10 and larger is not a problem.

    All relative and dependent on expectations and demands of the image maker.



    Bernice


    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Kadillak View Post
    Been shooting primarily 8x10 for 15 years and never ever have I had a situation where I witnessed or could see in the negative / print the adverse effects of film sag on 8x10 even shooting straight down at an image. Sharp as a tack. Similarly I have never seen a problem with this on 11x14 although I have to admit that I have never taxed the conventional horizontal +/- 20 degrees with he 11x14. Why be concerned about something that by its own implementation could induce a problem with double stick tape?

  10. #70
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    9,222

    Re: 8x10 photography and diffraction

    I have had many 8x10 negatives adversely affected (as in unusable) by film movement during exposure, but this is over a 25 year period in conditions that might be different than Michael's...such as 10 to 30 minute exposures in cool damp climates. But most of them were due to the film shifting in the holder during the exposure, not sagging/popping. Giving the film holder a bump with the heel of my hand before inserting the holder into the camera is now providing protection against that...thus I could do away with the tape.

    I have a boatload of 11x14s to develop, so hopefully I will not see any problems with those.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

Similar Threads

  1. Optimizing diffraction and DOF
    By feppe in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-Apr-2012, 09:54
  2. No more diffraction??
    By Wally in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16-Mar-2009, 10:01
  3. Practical diffraction
    By Jim Rice in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2006, 12:38
  4. About Diffraction
    By Chad Shindel in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 8-May-2006, 16:11
  5. Diffraction
    By Douglasa A. Benson in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 15-Oct-2001, 18:37

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •