
Originally Posted by
Drew Wiley
I don't think B&H is doing anything shady. Here in Calif there are several chain stores who advertise "we pay the sales tax" for a particular promotion or sales events. All it means is that they are offsetting the tax with an equal discount, so that the bottom line total you pay at the register comes out as if there weren't a sales tax, but they still have to remit the same percentage of the total to the State. It's nothing more than a marketing trick, but perfectly legal as long as the State gets its due percentage cut per specific city or county. In the case of B&H, it means significantly cutting into their own profit margin to be able to do that, which in turn means they have to raise profits somewhere else to stay in business. It has nothing to do with credit card laws. Dealers in states which collect sales tax have an inherent disadvantage going up against other states which refuse to do so per shipments. There has been a long-running feud between CA and NY in this respect. Calif was able to enforce it for the past decade or so only if a particular company like Amazon actually had a branch office or distribution facility in this State. But the overall clamor spilled over that temporary dam of a compromise, which was mandated by the Supreme Court, and led to a firmer resolution a couple years ago, in which NY and other non-collectors lost. In the meantime, it must have been a nightmare collecting the thousands of different tax rates relative to a myriad of Zip codes, which are constantly changing anyway. That logistical hurdle was the primary reason the Court delayed for so long setting their foot down.
Bookmarks