Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Selenium Toner question

  1. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,654

    Re: Selenium Toner question

    Quote Originally Posted by Doremus Scudder View Post
    FWIW, I routinely test my prints for residual hypo and residual silver compounds (HT-2 and ST-1 tests respectively). I test the last print through a batch of fixer almost every run. My prints never have even the slightest stain, so they're passing the tests with flying colors. I've been toning this way for 15 or more years, testing as I go and have never had a problem.
    With rigorous testing like that you should be fine indeed. I don't think there is anything more you could reasonably do.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Oregon now (formerly Austria)
    Posts
    3,408

    Re: Selenium Toner question

    Owen,

    Testing isn't really that difficult. I have the solutions on-hand and just put a drop of each on the margin of last print of a run through the fixer, wait three minutes and check for stain. Then it's back in the wash for a few minutes to wash out the chemicals on the margin. EZPZ.

    FWIW, you can use KRST 1+9 instead of the ST-1 (which doesn't keep quite as well). I test out of habit; I'm pretty confident that I'm using my fixer wisely (i.e., two-bath and not to capacity) and washing long enough.

    Back to the toner: as long as whatever is in the toner that's not toning the print washes out, there should be no problems. Insoluble silver compounds in the toning bath would precipitate out if they were ever formed. If prints are well-fixed before hitting the toner, there shouldn't be any carry-over of unfixed or partially-fixed thiosulfates to the toning bath in the first place.

    Best,

    Doremus

  3. #13
    Joe O'Hara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Marlton, NJ
    Posts
    777

    Re: Selenium Toner question

    Thanks Doremus, it sounds like as usual you've thought this through very well.

    When I finally decide to start over with a new batch of KRST, I dump it into the same bucket that I dump
    my used fixer. That bucket has a couple of pieces of steel wool in it to (it is hoped) scavenge the silver from
    the fixer before it gets into my septic system. I figure the selenium in the old toner will plate out on the silver
    that has plated out on the iron, but I'm not a chemist. After a week or three down the pipe it goes.

    Based on what I've read here, I'll just keep on filtering the KRST solution and replenishing it as needed. It does
    seem to work fine once I've gotten all the crystals and sludgy bits out of it. At my rate of usage I'll never need
    to buy another liter of concentrate again.
    Where are we going?
    And why are we in this handbasket?


    www.josephoharaphotography.com

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Posts
    1,087

    Re: Selenium Toner question

    For archival protection I remember reading a scientific study/article that proper washing and mounting protected the image more than selenium alone. It suggested that "pollution" from the rear of the image and interaction with the paper was more damaging than the silver/emulsion surface.
    The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
    http://www.searing.photography

Similar Threads

  1. selenium toner: the fool's gold toner
    By olive92 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 14-May-2016, 01:18
  2. Selenium toner
    By Ginette in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 21-Aug-2013, 09:16
  3. Selenium Toner
    By Vlad Soare in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2008, 14:37
  4. Selenium Toner
    By John Flavell in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 13-Nov-2004, 22:03

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •