Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    779

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Pyro for sure gives me the results I like best. Better than D76, rodinal, etc.

    But this is of course subjective, so you’ll find as many answers as good developers.

  2. #12
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,388

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    It's quite compatible with a variety of developers. Originally I used Perceptol, but now for many years have exclusively used PMK pyro.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    658

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Can't help but like the result in ID11 stock.
    Expert in non-working solutions.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    101

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmo22 View Post
    I'm returning to LF after a hiatus of many years. Previously, I shot Fuji Velvia 50 exclusively and had the sheets developed at the lab. Now I intend to shoot PF4+ and develop myself at home. I'm tempted to use Ilford's DDX, but wanted to get some input before buying my chemicals.

    Accordingly, what is your favorite developer for FP4+?

    Thanks in advance.
    As others have said, there are a lot of equally valid suggestions. HC-110 is an excellent choice for a number of reasons.

    1) It has a very long shelf life.

    2) Although you can mix up a stock solution (with a limited shelf life), it is very economical to mix it directly from concentrate using a small syringe (the kind you get with some cough medicines)

    3) It is very versatile and can be used in just about any dilution to control contrast.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmo22 View Post
    Accordingly, what is your favorite developer for FP4+?
    I use Xtol, wich is my favourite developer, also for fp4+. IMHO Xtol is technically very difficult to beat, 1/3 speed advantage in the shadows vs D-76. Finer grain (stock) while sharper, what looks contradictory, but it's what Kodak says:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	___grain.JPG 
Views:	24 
Size:	21.8 KB 
ID:	191297

    And also it is vitamin c based (Ascorbic acid), so very low toxicity and environment friendly. I mix the stock solution with (deionized) distilled water, and lasts more than one year. I use it 1:1 mixed with tap water.

    Of course one may like many developers because of many reasons, but I find xtol is one of the the best choices for general usage, so a good choice to start with.

    This is the effect vs rodinal, that is seen exagerated in P3200, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSvQh17SxkE Rodinal is also a fantastic developer, but one needs to know why wanting to use it.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    2,084

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew O'Neill View Post
    Pyrocat-HD.
    Xtol 1+1.
    Pretty much what I do mostly at the moment. With some 510-Pyro thrown in once in a while, but I like the tonality better that pyrocat and mytol/xtol give.

  7. #17

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    DDX is surely good and very convenient too. Xtol is good. Hard to go wrong with FP4 anyway.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmo22 View Post
    Accordingly, what is your favorite developer for FP4+?
    I've worked with a variety and settled on one I can prepare just before use, from the actual ingredients (there are only 2). You might find this article on D-23 Developer helpful.

    If you are willing to purchase a scale you can mix all your own chemistry on demand and use formulas that are simple and effective. See "Odorless Stop Bath" and "Favorite Fixer: Alkaline" here.

  9. #19
    Jeffery Dale Welker
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    519

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    Excellent comments and suggestions - thank you all.

    Since I do not have a traditional darkroom in my home, I'll be using a Stearman SP-445 tank that will let me develop 4 sheets at a time. I'm excited to get started.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    295

    Re: Ilford FP4+ Developer Inquiry

    It's an excellent solution for people who don't have a darkroom at home. Tim (the creator) has a bunch of videos you should watch. In particular, watch the one about squeezing the tank before sealing! If you don't squeeze it as shown in the video, it leaks and you'll think it's defective. If you squeeze it properly, it works perfectly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Salmo22 View Post
    Excellent comments and suggestions - thank you all.

    Since I do not have a traditional darkroom in my home, I'll be using a Stearman SP-445 tank that will let me develop 4 sheets at a time. I'm excited to get started.

Similar Threads

  1. A Question about Ilford Delta 100 Developer
    By jianglinxi in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2014, 12:48
  2. TriX in Ilford developer
    By Bob Kerner in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18-Feb-2011, 12:40
  3. Tmax100 & Ilford Hc developer
    By lewis-richards in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Nov-2009, 20:11
  4. Has Ilford ID-11 Developer Changed?
    By neil poulsen in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5-Apr-2009, 07:59
  5. Ilford Delta 100 + DD-X Developer
    By Ken Lee in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 3-May-2006, 06:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •