Like
Like
a number of studio portraits, shot with the Toyo/Omega View 45D:
Shot on expired and mostly underexposed T-Max 100 (at some point I will have to admit that I'm really bad in transferring digital readings to analog exposure in the studio):
Shot on expired and cross-processed Fuji CDU film. First one was horribly underexposed/underdeveloped.
The first three were shot with the Schneider Xenar 150mm/f5.6, the last one was shot with the Sinaron-S 240mm/f5.6.
No photoshop apart from spotting.
They look great to me! If you're talking about getting light levels set with a digital camera, my experience is that the digital cameras are significantly more sensitive at a given rating than film is.
“You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know
Took and developed this one today.
But now that I see it this way I see some strange things going on... Like... noise?
Kodak T-Max 400
Ilfosol 3 (1/9)
AstridStockmans by Smith De Westelinck, on Flickr
Love it Luke
They look like scanning / sharpening artifacts... is this the first time you encounter this??
Yes, I need to be over-exposing by at least one stop when I shoot in the studio (and use the light meter of the digital cameras). But I constantly forget to do so.
Long time lurker, my first contribution to the portrait threads!
Wista 45 SP, Rodenstock Sironar-N 210mm at f8.0. Kodak T-Max 100 developed in ilford DD-X.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Bookmarks