Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Reducing the size of a negative?

  1. #1

    Reducing the size of a negative?

    I know there are englargers, but is it possible to reduce the size of film negative?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The "Live Free or Die" state
    Posts
    771

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    You can do it digitally by scanning and writing a new negative to film with a film recorder like a LightJet or LVT.

    You could also photograph the negative and then contact print a copy to another sheet of film to reverse it again. You can also do this using an enlarger if you can make the geometry work.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    3,061

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by kendolinator324058943 View Post
    I know there are englargers, but is it possible to reduce the size of film negative?
    Yes, of course... even you can reduce size hundreds of times. Depending on the ratio there are several choices. If reduction is to be to 1/4 I'd reverse the enlarging lens. If if was to 1/2 of the size then I'd use a Rodagon D or R, perhaps reversed.

    It's important to note that the copied negative would be a positive, so reversal process would be necessary, or making a contact copy of the reduction. This would require using duplication film that has low ISO, high sharpness and a the right "proper" contrast. Other films would be suitable, but an accurate film calibration and refined method would be nice.

    As Larry says using a film recorder machine would be also a good choice, this is the easy way. LVT Rhino delivers high resolving power, a lightjet or a lambda have a resolving power that's good for prints so suitable for contact copies of the reduced negative. If the reduced negative has to be enlarged to be printed then you need the LVT Rhino job.

    Half of the Genesis Exhibition (Salgado's post 2007 shots) were enlaged from negatives printed with a LVT Rhino.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The "Live Free or Die" state
    Posts
    771

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pere Casals View Post
    LVT Rhino delivers high resolving power, a lightjet or a lambda have a resolving power that's good for prints so suitable for contact copies of the reduced negative. If the reduced negative has to be enlarged to be printed then you need the LVT Rhino job.
    LightJet made film recorders too. They were Res80, or 2032ppi. So good for at least 5 to 10x enlargements depending on your requirements.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Northwest of Chicago
    Posts
    1,327

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    Way back in the dark recesses of time-1973-I did a series shot on 35mm film which I printed about 1/2 size. As I remember I simply extended the enlarging lens as far as it would go and focused by raising and lowering the enlarger chassis.

    I provided a magnifying glass to view the prints. It was all so artistic...

  6. #6
    Randy Moe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    10,559

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    I have an 8X10 Elwood enlarger with a 14" cone lens board which I believe was for reductions.

    I never tried it and I am not offering to do your goal.

    But, they used to do this all time, found this book and description on Google. Also cut and paste way before PS.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=6v...prints&f=false

    IMG_0491 by TIN CAN COLLEGE, on Flickr
    TIN CAN COLLEGE

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    3,061

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gebhardt View Post
    LightJet made film recorders too. They were Res80, or 2032ppi. So good for at least 5 to 10x enlargements depending on your requirements.
    Larry, thanks for pointing it, I was not aware that LightJet2000 and Fire1000 film recorders even existed. The 2000 makes 1114" !!

  8. #8
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Memphis blues again...
    Posts
    5,441

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Moe View Post
    I have an 8X10 Elwood enlarger with a 14" cone lens board which I believe was for reductions.
    Or possibly making mural-sized prints with the enlarger set horizontally?

    I think the OP needs to clarify if he wants to reduce the negative digitally, make a smaller interneg in the darkroom, or if making a print smaller than the negative would suffice.
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    The "Live Free or Die" state
    Posts
    771

    Re: Reducing the size of a negative?


Similar Threads

  1. Making a size reducing mask for a Durst 138 neg carrier
    By Bogdan Karasek in forum Darkroom: Equipment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22-Nov-2015, 21:54
  2. spot reducing negative?
    By Robert Oliver in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13-Jan-2012, 23:39
  3. 4 1/2 by 5 1/8 negative size
    By redrockcoulee in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 7-Oct-2008, 09:36
  4. reducing density on negative
    By N Dhananjay in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 30-May-1999, 22:18

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •