Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 14x20 ULF In Practice

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    74

    14x20 ULF In Practice

    Well here’s my dilemma I have been working with all formats up to 8x10 for years now but I am not satisfied yet because I’m missing something in my work and so it’s time for me to think about something bigger than I have worked on in the past! I have seen some amazing 14x20 platinum prints from Kenro Izu! I have seen his camera and so it’s what I’m looking for!

    I’m more than likely going to have one built and I know about the current camera builders available but I haven’t decided which one will I use for the moment!

    Yes, I have seen RR 14x20 that he has built for other photographers...

    I want to see the photographers who are actually using this big camera and the lenses they are using with them!

    Please share your best images and not so best images, pros and cons of course is always greatly appreciated!

    I photograph landscapes/seascapes, still life and abstracts!

    My wants for the camera I will have built will also have a reducing back for 11x14....

    The negatives will be mainly platinum prints and silver gelatin contact prints...

    Yes, I’m very aware of the film availability for this format Ilford FP4+ that it’s the best film to use for platinum prints and more


    Thanks for your help in this ULF adventure

  2. #2
    William Whitaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    NE Tennessee
    Posts
    1,423

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Have you looked into the cost of having 14x20 film holders specially made? It might be sobering.

    Consider 16x20 and a razor blade.

    I personally can't imagine carrying a camera as large as you propose plus an 11x14 reducing back, plus 11x14 holders. Use the razor blade some more if you really want 11x14.

    I admire your enthusiasm and I don't mean to be a wet blanket. If you want to restrict yourself to a studio, I can maybe see it. But the thought of carrying all the necessary equipment makes me feel faint!

    ~Will (who's pretty much met his match at 12x20...)

  3. #3
    LF/ULF Carbon Printer Jim Fitzgerald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Washington
    Posts
    3,929

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Will, that is why we use the rolling carts!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,330

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    One approach that I would take is to purchase a Chamonix 11x14 and make or have someone make you a custom back extension for 14x20.
    http://www.piercevaubel.com/cam/roc/roc.extension.htm
    I have seen a 14x17 back extension made to fit an 11x14 view camera. A 14x20 back extension seems like it would be a very plausible unit to have and shoot with. First though I'd seriously consider the format size that you want to shoot. I love the 11x14 format, but if I were to start over, I'd increase the 14 inch dimension by a few inches. Just because someone else shoots 14x20, no reason for you to copy that format. You just might see things as more square or more panoramic.
    As far as film holders go:
    Chamonix 12x20 $585.00
    Chamonix 16x20 $695.00
    I don't recall if I bought my 3 Chamonix 11x14 holders new or pre-owned, but new ones now go for $540.00 each. I could have easily got by with 2 based on shooting with my 11x14 over the past years. I bet you that Chamonix could make 14x20 holders for around $650.00? each. Doubt that you'd never have the need for more than 2 14x20 holders.
    Also how would you transport your camera seems to be dictated by where and what you shoot. My favorite places are the gorges in New England... a rolling cart out of the question for me. For me, hiking up gorges dictated my switching to an 8x10 camera that I was able to backpack in. Tried it once with my 11x14 in a backpack, but hiking with it up 4th class "trails" proved to be too dangerous for me.
    Good luck and if you really like the 14x20 format ... go for it.

  5. #5
    LF/ULF Carbon Printer Jim Fitzgerald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Washington
    Posts
    3,929

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Richard Ritter could make the camera and holders as well.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,330

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Fitzgerald View Post
    Richard Ritter could make the camera and holders as well.
    Thanks for adding in Richard. Ironically he's only a couple of hours ride north of me. Personally use Chamonix LF and ULF, but over the years have know of a few other photographers that used Ritter's cameras and universally they all loved them.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Collinsville, CT USA
    Posts
    2,330

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Any images of your rolling cart? So wish I could use one on the trails and up the gorges down here here in New England.

  8. #8
    lab black
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    135

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    The Nikkor M 450 mm (stopped down) is often considered a good first lens for ULF. The 19 in Dagor (stopped down) should also cover 14 x 20.
    "We work in the dark, we do what we can, we give what we have."
    Henry James

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    259

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Fitzgerald View Post
    Richard Ritter could make the camera and holders as well.
    And for a better price than the Chamonix. Lighter, too, and sturdy enough judging from another 14x20 users comments a couple years back. If you're serious give him a call.

  10. #10

    Re: 14x20 ULF In Practice

    Hi SLVRGLTN,

    I have asked myself this question wehter to upgrade or not. Coming from 4x5 and 8x10 I have been keen on 16x20.

    I mainly take landscape, architecture, industry, only b/w but also wetplate in full plate/8x10. At the moment I am printing exclusivly wet or on contact pt/pd and carbon.

    Finally I decided against .. for the time being. Main reasons have been bulkiness not only with the camera but also with the sometimes necessary two tripods. The invest from the very first beginning: camera, lens(es), holder(s), film.

    I am just creating my own workflow with scanning 4x5/8x10 and print negatives on a cheep used epson 7800 for contacts, either pt/pd or carbon. So my resulting negatives can (potentially) up to 24 inches wide and what ever long. This is a size I probably need some years to handle in carbon ;-)

    In that way there is enough money and room left to buy as much film and chemicals as I ever want ;-). With my Technika and 3 lenses and some holders on tour with my motor bike? No problem. Easy travelling ...

    I am flexible with my tools, can easily repair, replace or extend them without asking a specialist or to save money before.

    To be honest I am thinking about constructing my own 50x70cm or larger. But it is more the challenge with building a CNC molding cutter, constructing building and improving ;-)

    horst

Similar Threads

  1. Ritter 14x20 camera
    By ndg in forum Cameras - ULF (Ultra Large Format) and Accessories
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 4-Dec-2015, 23:59
  2. 14x20 holder specs
    By jodyake in forum Cameras - ULF (Ultra Large Format) and Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-Jun-2015, 08:24
  3. FUJI NEOPAN 100 14X20 ACROS film?
    By pierre506 in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 14-Feb-2015, 23:32
  4. Practice Does anyone do it?
    By RichardRitter in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 7-Aug-2008, 13:42
  5. Do you practice?
    By Norm Buchanan in forum On Photography
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18-Dec-2007, 08:01

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •