Page 3 of 15 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 144

Thread: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    3,102

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    I dunno, I couldn't find a good balance.

    GX617, 90/5.6, FP4+


    Sand Dunes by tuco, on Flickr

  2. #22
    Corran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North GA Mountains
    Posts
    8,918

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Pretty good balance IMO tuco!
    Bryan | Blog | YouTube | Instagram | Portfolio
    All comments and thoughtful critique welcome

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    40

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    6x17 pinhole
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	40449844793_0b1c4f676a_b.jpg 
Views:	153 
Size:	43.0 KB 
ID:	189119

    realitySoSubtle 6×17,
    f/233, 2 sec. exposure
    Rollei Superpan 200,
    Rodinal 1:50, 17 min., 20°C,
    Epson V800 scan

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    3,102

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Quote Originally Posted by Corran View Post
    Pretty good balance IMO tuco!
    Thanks Bryan.

  5. #25
    Roger Thoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    San Francisco, CA, Flagstaff AZ
    Posts
    1,604

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    I dunno, I couldn't find a good balance.

    GX617, 90/5.6, FP4+


    Sand Dunes by tuco, on Flickr
    My first thought was that we have a winner.

    Roger

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    3,102

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Thoms View Post
    My first thought was that we have a winner.

    Roger
    Thanks Roger.

  7. #27
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,927

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    I like it as well, Tuco. Nice work.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    192

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.



    Holga WPC Panoramic, Fuji Neopan Acros, Pyrocat PC, Foma VC, Neutol WA

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Posts
    3,102

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter De Smidt View Post
    I like it as well, Tuco. Nice work.
    Thanks Peter.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Poolville, Texas
    Posts
    321

    Re: Panoramic Format (6x12 ~ 6x17, etc) B&W only.

    Kodak Panoram no 1 by rrunnertexas, on Flickr

    First roll of film, Kodak Tmax 100, shot at the "fast" shutter setting - Kodak Panoram no 1

Similar Threads

  1. Why 6x17 format vs. Cropped 6x12 or 4x5?
    By Larry Huppert in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17-Aug-2000, 19:03

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •