Last edited by Steven Ruttenberg; 3-Dec-2019 at 19:30.
I also lowered the color saturation a little, as a gradient layer, so that the top is the least saturated.
This helps make the sky and distance look more natural/convincing, but we retain deep saturation as we move towards the bottom of the image.
You can see it in the river: the closest part is deep blue but as it extends into the distance, the color becomes slightly more neutral. In nature we often see this kind of effect due to haze, unless we remove it with a minus-blue filter (b&w), polarizer (color) or some post-exposure treatment. Diminishing saturation over long distance (like diminishing contrast) can work as a depth cue to help the eye appreciate spectacular scenery like this.
Last edited by Ken Lee; 4-Dec-2019 at 10:14.
I see it now. Skies are always my toughest portion of a scene to get right. I'll have to remember that step. Thanks for the pointers.
Wow, great job.
Personally, I would edit out the fence, though.
What is your thought on leaving in man-made objects like this in a nature landscape? Just curious.
The fence is a historical artifact
I think it should stay
In a 1000 years it may disappear
Tin Can
People be different.
Of course, but I always look ahead...
Far ahead
It is entirely possible something from this era survives, perhaps Steven's image
Tin Can
I thought about removing it, but then decided to leave it. To me it adds to the barren feeling of the scene. Like an era where humans and most life have long left the earth. Almost apocalyptic. Like in a distant future after the nuclear winter begins to thaw. I also just think it adds to the scene.
Bookmarks