Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

  1. #11
    Steven Ruttenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Prescott Valley, AZ
    Posts
    2,788

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan9940 View Post
    No minimum. You need 1,050 ml to develop one sheet or 10.
    Okay.

  2. #12
    Steven Ruttenberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Prescott Valley, AZ
    Posts
    2,788

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred L View Post
    honestly, if you have the space (and funds) I would suggest dedicated tanks/drums. I have the jobo reels for 4x5 but prefer to use the Expert drum. 8x10 is either Expert drum or a Simma tube (very affordable and can also do 4x5)
    I have the space. I was looking at the expert drum, pricey, but I like the way the film goes into it. Looks pretty big, but manageable for inversion processing.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    70

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Based on some of your other threads, you are interested in special developing techniques and lots of control over the process. Doesn't this really point towards tray development rather than large drums made for rotary processing? You can do some things to increase the volume: shuffling sheets, dividers in one larger tray, several trays in parallel... IR goggles would probably help a lot.

    I spent a lot of time reading old forum posts when I was looking for a daylight tank for 4x5"/9x12cm. I came to the conclusion that every one of the common daylight solutions will impose its own comfort zone on you. It might be agitation regime, volume, fill/drain time, temp. control or something else but no tank will give optimum results across the full range of processing styles and developers.

    What I'd do for high volume shooting: Expert tank + a motorized rotary processor (Jobo, DIY, whatever). Then match the developer and other processing details to whatever works consistently well with rotary and your preferred film stock.

    What I currently do: trying to fine tune a good regime for Paterson Orbital. Low developer volume, fairly slow but constant agitation, four 9x12 sheets at a time. The Orbital is a tray with a curved bottom and light-trapped lid, fill and drain holes. There are basically two proven strategies to use it. One is what I do - constant agitation with the included base – by hand or motorized. This works with up to 200ml liquid, or perhaps a bit more, depending on if and how you modified the tank. The other is to overfill the tray and limit yourself to gently rocking it – giving semi-stand at best. If you want true intermittent agitation like you get with inversion tanks... well, you can't, not easily, at least. But the great thing about the Orbital is that it is format-agnostic like a normal tray. I can theoretically process 9x12cm to 8x10" or any size in between, metric or imperial, film, paper or glass plate, without buying any more stuff.
    I think it's a good example of the tradeoff between convenience and process flexibility with daylight dev systems. You can't beat open trays for flexibility. And you are most likely to avoid problems if you stick to manufacturers' recommendations. Dedicated rotary tank + motorized roller + developer that works with constant agitation = boring but practically guaranteed to work. Inversion with a big rotary tank, or stand with a tightly packed inversion tank = asking for trouble. YMMV, as usual.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    This is my 4x5 tank

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0163.jpg 
Views:	43 
Size:	19.3 KB 
ID:	184878

    I place it inside a paper safe so it's daylight type.

    After development done I close lights to move the sheets to water stop bath, I open lights after 15 seconds and I do the rest lights open. By fixing lights open I see fixer stregth and then I fix 2x the time it takes to clear.

    After moving the sheets to the stop bath and before opening lights I can load next batch of sheets, so while fixing/washing I can develop additional sheets because the daylight tank was to be idle, so it process faster than with common procedures. With proper tray it also makes 5x7 and 8x10 and...

    It is possible to develop each sheet with different times if different N or different film, just I close lights to open the paper safe to insert sheets at the right time.

    It's also great to get control from agitation, as sheets are horizontal almost there is no risk of bromide streaks from reduced agitation, alowing better control of highlights if also using diluted developer.

    If using it place emulsion up, to avoid any scratch from agitation. With Xtol 1:1 or 1:2 there is no waste (or little) with one shot, if I've to process a single sheet I just use a 4x5 tray for one shot.

    I find it quite convenient, shamefully cheap and amazingly flexible. But I use the drum for Velvia... of course...

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,581

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Steven,

    FWIW, I wouldn’t really recommend an Expert Drum for inversion style processing; I’m not even sure it would work because a LOT of chemistry would be needed to fill the tank. If you go with an Expert Drum, I’d just roll it around on a tabletop or use one of the motor bases.

  6. #16
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    I use Expert drums for rotary processing. I would not use them for inversion processing, for the same reasons as Alan.
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

  7. #17

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    north of the 49th
    Posts
    1,425

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    I third on NOT inverting Experts. Either roll it on the counter/sink or get a roller base (I have Simma bases) to alleviate the tedium of hand rolling. Again, if funds and space allow, get the spendy Jobo processor and make life simpler
    notch codes ? I only use one film...

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Iowa City, Iowa
    Posts
    1,715

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Pere Casals View Post
    This is my 4x5 tank

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_0163.jpg 
Views:	43 
Size:	19.3 KB 
ID:	184878

    I place it inside a paper safe so it's daylight type.

    After development done I close lights to move the sheets to water stop bath, I open lights after 15 seconds and I do the rest lights open. By fixing lights open I see fixer stregth and then I fix 2x the time it takes to clear.

    After moving the sheets to the stop bath and before opening lights I can load next batch of sheets, so while fixing/washing I can develop additional sheets because the daylight tank was to be idle, so it process faster than with common procedures. With proper tray it also makes 5x7 and 8x10 and...

    It is possible to develop each sheet with different times if different N or different film, just I close lights to open the paper safe to insert sheets at the right time.

    It's also great to get control from agitation, as sheets are horizontal almost there is no risk of bromide streaks from reduced agitation, alowing better control of highlights if also using diluted developer.

    If using it place emulsion up, to avoid any scratch from agitation. With Xtol 1:1 or 1:2 there is no waste (or little) with one shot, if I've to process a single sheet I just use a 4x5 tray for one shot.

    I find it quite convenient, shamefully cheap and amazingly flexible. But I use the drum for Velvia... of course...
    This is genius. Consider hard rubber 1/2 gallon tanks as well. I have Expert tanks, Jobo 2509n reels, Nikor Sheet film tank, and deep tanks and hangers. Everyone works. I couldn't load the reels confidently without my IR goggles.

    This tray adaption is simple genius. How do you glue the straws? This might be easier with polystyrene tray as you can solvent weld (glue) easier.

    As far as workflow I like the 2509n reels. It makes for easy washing in a gravity works washer. I can only load with IR goggles.

    I love this tray. I'm going to put one together!

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,566

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    Quote Originally Posted by Duolab123 View Post
    How do you glue the straws?
    Hot glue... rather than straws it would be better using plastic sticks, like those to stir coffe coffee

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	300px-Stanley-Hot-Glue-Gun-GR35K.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	9.0 KB 
ID:	184895



    Photographers formulary have also this kind of separators

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Photographers_Formulary_07_1025_Formulary_4x5_Sheet_Film_1349981445000_335947.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	47.4 KB 
ID:	184896

  10. #20
    Peter De Smidt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Fond du Lac, WI, USA
    Posts
    8,974

    Re: Which tank would you prefer for 4x5

    The tray and straws is a variation on a slosher tray.
    http://www.summitek.com/cradle.html
    “You often feel tired, not because you've done too much, but because you've done too little of what sparks a light in you.”
    ― Alexander Den Heijer, Nothing You Don't Already Know

Similar Threads

  1. Which mountain composition do you prefer?
    By nimo956 in forum Image Sharing (Everything Else) & Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-Jul-2015, 13:33
  2. Wax on GG? Anyone prefer this?
    By gevalia in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 9-Apr-2010, 17:03

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •