Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Rodenstock Sironar 210mm f5.6 macro

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    11,372

    Re: Rodenstock Sironar 210mm f5.6 macro

    Quote Originally Posted by jesse1996 View Post
    I didn't realize I typed 120! I meant to type 210mm. I'm looking into the 210mm Rodenstock Sironar N Macro lens. I saw on Catlabs that it covers 8x10 with plenty at infinity with Macro being even more so. Apologies for the confusion.
    Assuming it does cover at infinity, it is a poor performer at other then macro ranges.

  2. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    6,700

    Re: Rodenstock Sironar 210mm f5.6 macro

    Quote Originally Posted by jesse1996 View Post
    I didn't realize I typed 120! I meant to type 210mm. I'm looking into the 210mm Rodenstock Sironar N Macro lens. I saw on Catlabs that it covers 8x10 with plenty at infinity with Macro being even more so. Apologies for the confusion.
    No worries! But please slow down and read carefully. The listing at CatLabs says "(covers close to 8X10 at infinity)". The wording before that, about "standard, non-macro lens, with very large coverage", refers to smaller formats only. 210mm is the "standard" or "normal" focal length for 5x7.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    6,987

    Re: Rodenstock Sironar 210mm f5.6 macro

    This https://www.catlabs.info/product/rod...r-4x5-5x7-8x10 one? Vendors sometimes exaggerate coverage.

    For a contrasting, perhaps more correct, view, see http://www.graflex.org/lenses/lens-spec.html and https://www.photo.net/discuss/thread...sironar.37076/

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •