I am one of the supporters of Intrepid and one of the most constructive critics too. I provide feed back on all the problems I have had (several of them mostly related to lack of quality control). I think they have a small force and younger kids that may not have the experience many old makers have. I support them because it is the only NEW effort to maintain film and LF alive. They have succeeded on getting a large number of youngster into LF. I supported knowing what I was going to get into. Honestly, I expected a lot worst (the first edition of the 4x5 was really crude, but it works). I saw the first edition of the 8x10 and was not happy, I could see it lacked some engineering. However, the second version of the 8x10 is a lot better and stable. I got mine with several quality control problems (mostly gluing the bellows not really aligned, which includes a torque to maintain the front standard straight, but it works), other things I could easily fix with my small tools (after all, I am a wood worker), but those who dont have the woodworking experience are in trouble. The intrepid is just one of the cameras I have in my arsenal, although, they are the ones I use when I have to walk long ways, or go places and have to pack them with my luggage. They do the job.
Bookmarks