I'm one of those who is not pleased with the Intrepid 8X10 camera (previous iteration to current).
You want to know whats a "huge turnoff"?? Buying a brand new camera - regardless of its price point - and discovering that not only does it NOT work "right out of the box" (mine had a non-functioning base/focusing rail that had to be replaced and totally unusable lens board: warped into a crescent shape), but new problems develop soon after being put into service: knobs quickly lose the ability to be tightened, and components don't lock down tightly, parts fall off (the magnets have fallen out of the rear frame, the felt has come off with it, and a piece of hardware has come out of the rear frame). Also, the focusing gear assembly in the base is now failing: the teeth are 3D-printed and they now grind and skip, like the first one that had to be replaced (I imagine this is why they quickly changed the focusing rail design in the new version, because the previous one was difficult to get right).
There are other minor nuisances but its the major flaws I regard as problematic: I doubt this camera will last long, and the truth is that I have barely used it! (I rely on my 1935 Deardorff more often) So for the money spent, I suggest an old Kodak 2D or similar instead, which actually has a chance of lasting another 50 years, with some care - even if it is a bit rough and may need some attention. To suggest that Intrepid is encouraging a new generation of large format users is a stretch, when they are shipping cameras with serious problems that are evident the second you get it out of the box. I'm sure there are plenty of buyers who are not having these problems, but I have personally spoken with several people who have also had serious quality control/manufacturing issues with the camera they received. I hope Intrepid survives this "growing pains" phase of their career and can nail down these manufacturing problems, and ship a working camera 100% of the time. It seems that goal is a ways off yet, however.
Bookmarks