Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: why not to get suckered by resolution numbers

  1. #1
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,775

    why not to get suckered by resolution numbers

    This page http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/technical/resolution.html

    on Bob Atkins' excellent site for geeks, gives one of the most lucid explanations I've seen for why resolution tests are worse than meaningless. He has other pages that go into detail on MTF, SQF, and other information that should, after a while, drive you to turn off the computer, clear your head, and take a few pictures.

  2. #2
    Founder QT Luong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1997
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,311

    why not to get suckered by resolution numbers

    He's just addressing aerial image tests. Most folks don't even have the set-up to perform such tests and use test targets. In general, Bob tries (and succeeds !) to explain things in plain language without equations. The site truly for geeks is http://normankoren.com/

  3. #3
    Abuser of God's Sunlight
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    brooklyn, nyc
    Posts
    5,775

    why not to get suckered by resolution numbers

    some of that only applies to aerial images, but one of the main points ... that the single number value (which tells us the point at which modulation drops to zero) tells us nothing about the shape of the mtf curve, or about the modulation at frequencies that are actually most important to the human eye for perceiving sharpness and image quality. This will vary depending on enlargement size and veiwing distance, but at least an mtf graph gives you much of the information you need to figure it all out. The single number values can be completely deceptive.

  4. #4
    Founder QT Luong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1997
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,311

    why not to get suckered by resolution numbers

    Many agree that MTF at 0 is meaningless, but MTF at 50% is not too bad for a single number, although of course is always more informative to have the whole curve.

Similar Threads

  1. User names with numbers at the end
    By Tom Westbrook in forum News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-May-2006, 03:59
  2. Can I set a shutter speed in between the numbers?
    By Chris_6172 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 8-Feb-2006, 15:56
  3. What do all the numbers on the film box mean?
    By Jeff G. in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-Nov-2005, 08:37
  4. Why EV numbers instead of f-stops?
    By Ellis Vener in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28-Sep-1998, 01:09

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •