All of the grip material is falling off and it has over 200k shutter actuations, so it's not worth much. And I'd be worried the shutter would die right after I converted it...also I would probably feel limited by 12mp - or do you find the usable resolution improves with such a modification? Have you printed much from your D800? Honestly I would probably want to burn negatives of any excellent images to make silver prints from such a camera.
Most of what I have posted here is from my Nikon D70. It only has 6mp. The last image I posted is from my Nikon D2x. It has 12mp. I have printed 13x19 inch prints without any problems with the D70. The D2x does better while printing, but I still like the look of the D70 more.
Thanks Jon. I'll have to stick to full-frame so as to make use of the lenses I have (if I want to get ultrawide that is, without buying more lenses). But good to know wrt the pixel count.
Well, right now I can't afford it anyway, but perhaps next year .
I upgraded from a converted D100 to a D800 (a member here sold the converted D800 to me). I only print up to 13x19 with it. Converted cameras are slightly sharper as I think one of the sensor filters goes away. The major advantages to the use of the newer camera are: full frame so I can use wide angle lenses as they were intended, 2. more dynamic range that you don't get in vintage digital cameras, 3. Video recording.
Bookmarks