Sorry to inconvenience you. How about it, Mr. Moderator?
No, not a waste, as it gave others a list of possibilities of issues to check for if this or other things creep into the system...
This was part of a learning process, with a positive result, so why a waste!?!!!
Steve K
naaah
i've been shooting primarily expired film and paper and liquid emulsions for almost 2 decades
and never had problems. some people have problems because they use the wrong developer
or methods to process their films, and the wrong methods to expose their films. its like the developerscientists
that suggest if you make coffee developers you have to scale it out and mix things in a special order
and let it sit for days and decant off the good stuff before saying some magic spell ... couldn't be further from the truth.
OP
good luck !
Thanks, jnanian. After wasting everyone's time with a scanner problem, I'm getting nice exposures outa this 20+ year old film. Pics aren't that great but the film is okay.
Cavanaugh Flight Museum by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr
Kenny
Kenny, you wasted no one's time. Some of us are just grumpy old goats. You asked for help with a problem. As a team, we solved the problem. Some of us learned something in the process, not just you. It's a win/win, IMO.
It was a useful reminder of why I used Plus-X.
The problem with finding an unopened 100 sheet box of Plus-X in good shape is if there will be a next box?
Bookmarks