Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Multiple Exposure Question:

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Doncaster UK
    Posts
    500

    Multiple Exposure Question:

    Can someone confirm I have this correct please.

    I have metered a scene to be 2 seconds @ f/32. Forget reciprocity as I am using Acros 100

    I want to use 1/8th of a second shutter speed and nothing else.

    To get to my final destination of 2 seconds, how many times would I need to open the shutter speed?.

    My calculation tells me, 5

    Have I got this right or wrong.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    1,130

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Just double the number of exposures for each decrease in shutter speed:

    1 exposure -- 2 seconds
    2 exposures -- 1 second each (1+1=2 seconds)
    4 exposures -- 1/2 second each (.5+.5+.5+.5=2 seconds)
    8 exposures -- 1/4 second each (.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25=2 seconds)
    16 exposures -- 1/8 second each (.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125=2 seconds)
    Last edited by xkaes; 20-Nov-2017 at 05:37.

  3. #3
    John Olsen
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Whidbey Island, WA
    Posts
    577

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Or f8 for 1/8th second. I'm curious, what's your reason for wanting 1/8th of a second?

  4. #4
    Vaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Humboldt County, CA
    Posts
    6,716

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    And any inaccuracy in the shutter speed (plus or minus) will be magnified 16 times, but test negatives will show this and corrections can be easily made.
    "Landscapes exist in the material world yet soar in the realms of the spirit..." Tsung Ping, 5th Century China

  5. #5
    tgtaylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    4,150

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Easily solved using one of the crown jewels of education - elementary algebra:

    Let X be the number of shutter openings needed. Then,

    X*(1/8)=2. Given.
    Multiplying both sides by 8 gives
    X=16.
    Proof: 16*(1/8)=16/8=2.

    Thomas

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Seoul
    Posts
    145

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    5 1/8 exposures adds up to 5/8ths of a second.

    8/8ths = 1 second. So you need 16 exposures at 1/8th for 2 seconds in total. Don't think algebra need come into it, just a cup of tea or coffee and a fresh look at it
    Peter

  7. #7
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    4,453

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    What Peter said. With a cup of tea for sure.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Doncaster UK
    Posts
    500

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Thanks everyone for putting me straight on this, I was way off but now I know for next time :-)

  9. #9
    Drew Bedo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    2,252

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Quote Originally Posted by xkaes View Post
    Just double the number of exposures for each decrease in shutter speed:

    1 exposure -- 2 seconds
    2 exposures -- 1 second each (1+1=2 seconds)
    4 exposures -- 1/2 second each (.5+.5+.5+.5=2 seconds)
    8 exposures -- 1/4 second each (.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25+.25=2 seconds)
    16 exposures -- 1/8 second each (.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125+.125=2 seconds)

    This sort of relationship holds true for multiple "pops" of strobe units for fractional exposures. If reciprocity is not an issue, the exposures are cumulative.
    Drew Bedo
    http://www.artsyhome.com/author/drew-bedo




    There are only three types of mounting flanges; too big, too small and wrong thread!

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Sheridan, Colorado
    Posts
    1,130

    Re: Multiple Exposure Question:

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Bedo View Post
    This sort of relationship holds true for multiple "pops" of strobe units for fractional exposures. If reciprocity is not an issue, the exposures are cumulative.
    With film, when using any meter, with very long exposures, the calculated or recommended exposure(s) might not result in the expected result, and some amount of adjustment or compensation must be made. Similarly, with very short exposures, the calculated or recommended exposure(s) might not result in the expected result, and some amount of adjustment or compensation must be made.

    Unfortunately. But, at least with film, I can make them -- corrected or not.
    Last edited by xkaes; 26-Nov-2017 at 09:39.

Similar Threads

  1. Multiple Exposure Question
    By IanBarber in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 29-Nov-2017, 11:39
  2. Multiple Exposure Calculations
    By RmFrase in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 22-Mar-2012, 16:47
  3. Multiple exposure..The same from InCamera and Photoshop??
    By johndesq125 in forum Digital Processing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4-Nov-2009, 10:47
  4. Double exposure - multiple exposure
    By cyrus in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20-Jun-2007, 12:43
  5. multiple exposure techniques
    By emanuele mora in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Sep-2001, 17:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •