Show me one single picture of a non coated lens with fungus please.
Show me one single picture of a non coated lens with fungus please.
"You dont take a picture, it's given to you"
www.alextimmermans.com
www.collodion-art.blogspot.com
email : collodion-art dot onsmail dot nl
You like being spoon-fed, don't you? http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Goerz_Box_TengorOriginally Posted by alex from holland
http://www.thecamerasite.net/09_Gene...ges/fungus.htm
Google is your friend.
More yummy spoon feed - http://www.appcott.co.uk/VINTAGE6X6/.../KODAK_no3.htm
Google is your friend for more yummy food.
More yummy stuff - scroll down for special treats. Bon appétit!
https://randcollins.wordpress.com/category/restoration/
Because you thought all that WWII battle against fungus in optical instruments was just invented?
No, i just said I have never ever seen a non coated lens with fungus.
So i really would like to see a picture of it.
"You dont take a picture, it's given to you"
www.alextimmermans.com
www.collodion-art.blogspot.com
email : collodion-art dot onsmail dot nl
And tbe coating was invented in 1935. So maybe these lenses were already coated
"You dont take a picture, it's given to you"
www.alextimmermans.com
www.collodion-art.blogspot.com
email : collodion-art dot onsmail dot nl
Not convinced by your examples!
The tengor has a common balsam "growing snowflake" problem.
The Kodak has "whispy" fungus, which has no attachment to the lens surface.
The long restoration says "the fungus was cleaned off with alcohol" - which is my experience too!
Did you see what age the camera and its lens have? Photographic lenses coated in 1935? Continue dreaming. How about just saying you were wrong? Costs too much?
Again - and the WWII battle against fungus in optical instruments was all invented? What a case!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks