Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Double and Triple Protars

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,610

    Re: Double and Triple Protars

    I have not tried it, but generally mixing B&L and Zeiss cells is not recommended. Even mixing generation one and two Zeiss cells is not recommended. You can tell the difference between the two by checking if the focal length is in mms or cms. The cms ones are the later design.

    I've had a lot of protars over the years and use them all the time. My experience has been that the single Zeiss cells (second generation) can't hold a candle to the B&L ones when used as single cells. Combined the Zeiss ones are outstanding. But as singles all the ones I tried has sharpness fall off that was extreme on the edges, even when I was well within the recommended film size and the lens was centered.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    232

    Re: Double and Triple Protars

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Crisp View Post
    I have not tried it, but generally mixing B&L and Zeiss cells is not recommended. Even mixing generation one and two Zeiss cells is not recommended. You can tell the difference between the two by checking if the focal length is in mms or cms. The cms ones are the later design.
    Very interesting, not recommended by whom? I have a Ross / B&L combination which I've used with good results. I notice there's an old thread about mixing and matching Protar VII cells here:
    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...I-Protar-cells

    I've not noticed that Zeiss single cells are any better or worse than Ross or B&L.

Similar Threads

  1. What's wrong with Protars?
    By Bill_1856 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28-May-2007, 11:20

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •