Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scarborough, UK
    Posts
    240

    Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

    I have just acquired a 3 1/2 inch f4 and a 6 inch f4.5 Ental II pair of lenses, but the aperture settings confuse me and I hope someone can explain them to me.

    The 3.5" f4 has these aperture settings 1 2 4 8 and 16 and the 6" has two sets of markings. The first set is exactly the same as the 3.5", but above those markings in the same window it has 30 25 20 15 10 and 5 so the number sequence is reversed to the first set.

    Can anyone enlighten me as to what these settings are?

    Thanks
    Bruce

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    7,685

    Re: Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

    Its an English thing. I have a Dallmeyer enlarging lens with a similar aperture scale.

    1 = wide open (time * 1 to get correct exposure)
    2 = 1 stop down (time * 2)
    4 = 2 stops down (time * 4)
    and so on.

    I'm not sure about the others.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Scarborough, UK
    Posts
    240

    Re: Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

    Having looked at it more last night, I now believe the second markings are the aperture diameter. I wonder if this lens was designed as a process lens.
    Does anyone know if Ental II were used as process lenses?
    Anyhow the glass is immaculate so I'll try and mount it and see how it performs
    Bruce

    Sent from my X17 using Tapatalk

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    7,685

    Re: Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

    The VM wavers a bit on design types, says that longer Ental IIs were heliar types. Shorter ones may be tessar types. Go count reflections.

    Process lenses? Not likely, Ental IIs are too fast for that.

  5. #5
    IanG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Aegean (Turkey & UK)
    Posts
    4,122

    Re: Rank Taylor Hobson lenses

    I've use a few Ental enlarger lenses and they were superb quality, very well made, not far off the best available now.

    An enlarger lens doesn't really need an f-stop aperture scale, the relative exposure scale is far easier, I'm surprised few other companies used it. The biggest customer for these lenses was the UK military, after WWII every medium sized and upwards Naval ship, and similarly Air Force and Army bases had their own photographic department usually with De Ver 54 and later 54a enlargers a range of TTH or Ross lenses.

    You're second lens indicate it may also have been sold or used for some other purpose as well, the field of applied photography was quite large, it still is and is an area most here don't know about. A glance at Langford's Applied Photography book would be an eye opener and things have advance a lot since then.

    Ian

Similar Threads

  1. 81/4 INCH f 4.5 XEROX RANK TAYLOR HOBSON
    By otzi in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13-Sep-2013, 21:14
  2. Taylor-Hobson-Cooke lenses
    By Frank Ward in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-Jun-2000, 08:38

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •