B&H No Longer Shipping Chemistry

[MAubrey]

Repeated unprovable accusations. Evidence please.

How are they not provable?

You literally just need to quote their reasons.

[Sal Santamaura]

Repeated unprovable accusations. Evidence please...

How are they not provable?

You literally just need to quote their reasons.

Reacting rather than thoroughly evaluating possibilities is an excellent way to make unprovable accusations, such as "B&H lied."

First, read post #245 in this thread:

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=1#post1365716

Then read how Henry Posner reacted to it in the first part of post #270:

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=1#post1365917

Finally, consider that B&H might have, since then, further negotiated its agreement(s) with shipping carriers and/or revised its internal procedures/training so that many darkroom chemicals could once again be shipped.

Can anyone prove B&H lied? No. Unless there's evidence, "quoting reasons" merely repeats an unprovable accusation. Not good.

[MAubrey]

Reacting rather than thoroughly evaluating possibilities is an excellent way to make unprovable accusations, such as "B&H lied."

First, read post #245 in this thread:

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=1#post1365716

Then read how Henry Posner reacted to it in the first part of post #270:

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...=1#post1365917

Finally, consider that B&H might have, since then, further negotiated its agreement(s) with shipping carriers and/or revised its internal procedures/training so that many darkroom chemicals could once again be shipped.

Can anyone prove B&H lied? No. Unless there's evidence, "quoting reasons" merely repeats an unprovable accusation. Not good.

The post I'm discussing are all after #290, so that's not relevant.

We'll have to agree to disagree on the rest. Cheers!

[Sal Santamaura]

How are they not provable?

You literally just need to quote their reasons.

The post I'm discussing are all after #290...

The only posts after #290 are ones that levy accusations. Ignoring posts that preceed it renders reasonable consideration of possibilities impossible.

...We'll have to agree to disagree on the rest...

No one has to "agree to disagree." Disagreement is a fact whether involved parties accept it or not.

After serving on a number of criminal trial juries, as well as observing participant behavior on several Internet forums over the years, I'm very glad that I don't even present the appearance of engaging in anything illegal. The willingness to "convict" without credible evidence is really scary.

[denverjims]

... Points well taken, moving along now I hope....

This is the last word!
No. THIS is the last word!
No. This is the LAST word!
No. This is REALLY the LAST word!
No. This is ABSOLUTELY the LAST word!
.
.
.



(Sorry, couldn't help myself. I know this is serious to some folks ...but really?)

[esearing]

What irked me today was that Ethol LPD in liquid form is shipped (for free) but the power form is pick up only. Had to order from their NY competitor which also got the rest of my order for Film, Papers, and some other accessories.