Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Imago Direct latent image retention

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    189

    Imago Direct latent image retention

    Hi all,

    I have been shooting some Imago Direct indoors for 'still life practice' and i find that aesthetically i like this material, so now i want to take this outside.

    From reading the instructions one thing worries me, they state that development should be immediately after exposure.

    How critical is this in practice? For example if i develop my exposures 24 hours later how will that affect the resulting image?

    Currently i develop inside of a daylight tank with a mod54 and with 4 minutes development time in Macoprint i get both clean blacks and whites and exposures look fine (within the 'latitude' and spectral sensitivity of this paper...) This would however rule out development-by-inspection.

    If i delay processing after exposure would i need longer developing time or otherwise compensate?

    If someone has some experience and tips to share, it would be greatly appreciated :-)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Greenwood Lake NY USA
    Posts
    211

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    The data sheet for this product states that processing should be immediate following exposure. How to interpret this? Minutes of time are probably not a problem. One hour might be a problem. In my personal opinion 24 hours is not immediate. Perhaps you can ask the manufacturer? It will depend to some extent on storage conditions. This is something that would be easy to test with an experimental exposure of two frames, one is processed immediately, one is held for 24 hours unprocessed and then processed using the same conditions, compare the two frames.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    189

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    Yup, i guess i will just have to try with the same exposure on 2 sheets and develop them 24 hours apart. Emailing the manufacturer is also a bit difficult as they dont really have their own website (as far as i could find).

    However the emulsion is supposedly the same as Ilford Harmon DPP (from looking at the data sheets the spectral sensitivity graphs are exactly the same) so i could ask them about retention expectations on their paper.

    I'll shoot them an email and if i get a reply i will write here, if someone else has some experience with this please let tell :-)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    2,775

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    Looks like you're boldly going where no man has gone before... not easy to do in 2016. Post your results when you have any!

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    189

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Sampson View Post
    Post your results when you have any!
    Any.....Now there is a challenger! :-D

    I plan to go to my local 'protected nature park' (read: the swampy forest with paths near my house) as soon as weather permits, shoot some sheets during the day and process them in the evening, lets see if this is practically viable......

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    189

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    I had a day out and shot 6 sheets of Imago on a stormy baltic coast.

    Firstly; i shot every composition with both a EI of 1.5 and 3, this was obviously wrong.

    All shots came out heavily overexposed complete whites with only very faint ghost images. The borders are perfectly black, so i guess the processing was fine.


    The image that had the most legible image on it was:



    Imago FB, EI 3, F/22, 8 Seconds, Fujinon 180mm

    I shot all sheets between 12:00 and 15:00 and processed them at 19:00, i'm not sure if the delay itself had any effect as i would expect that if it had i would actually not have had perfect whites.

    processing followed:

    Maco Ecoprint 1+9 4 minutes using a Mod54, initial agitation and then one inversion every minute. Stop and Fix as for normal FB paper.


    I'll try some more sheets soon but then at EI6, and i fear i have to read into the esoterica of preflashing. Another thing to try is to use a 3 stop grad ND.

  7. #7
    Jac@stafford.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Winona, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,401

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    I truly appreciate this thread. Great thanks to locutus for persevering.
    I'm hooked!
    .

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    now in Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    2,775

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    Well, you're on the path now. Don't give up!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    189

    Re: Imago Direct latent image retention

    Thanks for the comments.

    Atleast it is a fun path, there is a nice Polaroid style immediacy to it.

Similar Threads

  1. SLIMT (Selective Latent Image Manipulation Techniques) dilution percentages
    By swmcl in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-Jun-2016, 02:19
  2. Metering for IMAGO direct positive paper with iPhone lightmeter app
    By jonbrisbincreative in forum Style & Technique
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 7-Sep-2015, 02:23
  3. Harmon Direct Positive Paper - First Real Image
    By Kimberly Anderson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 8-Jan-2012, 19:55
  4. Latent Image Stability
    By Riaan Lombard in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17-Jan-2002, 02:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •