Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Question about Portrait euryscop

  1. #11

    Re: Question about Portrait euryscop

    and here from the 1903 NY catalogue



    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1903ddddddddd.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	59.8 KB 
ID:	150500

    Antique & Classic Camera Blog
    www.antiquecameras.net/blog.html

  2. #12
    LF/ULF Carbon Printer Jim Fitzgerald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Washington
    Posts
    3,929

    Re: Question about Portrait euryscop

    Expensive back in 1903

  3. #13
    Jac@stafford.net's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Winona, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,413

    Re: Question about Portrait euryscop

    ann
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Fitzgerald View Post
    Expensive back in 1903
    Yes, about $5200.00 in today's US dollar. A most important thing to consider is the relative cost of everyday items. Expenditures Middle-Class 1903, New England. Middle-Class annual income was about $1500, or 200% the average worker. (Forgive, my office was in a university library for years.)

Similar Threads

  1. Portrait Euryscop
    By mylek in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 1-Jul-2015, 11:41
  2. Voigtlander Portrait Euryscop 7a
    By brandon13 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 7-Mar-2015, 06:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •