Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: An interesting lens comparison test

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.,
    Posts
    47

    An interesting lens comparison test

    I haven't posted here for quite some time now, although I have always kept current by regularly browsing. So, it's nice to be back. Like some, I became more involved in the digital end of things, once the output quality became more viable. At the moment I'm very interested in alternative process printing, using both trad. & digital negatives for source material.
    For some time now, I've wanted to do some lens comparisons, between older vs newer glass, esp. looking at what difference the presence of coatings makes (or not). The lenses sampled here include the following:
    1. G-Claron 355mm SC
    2. G-Claron 270mm MC*
    3. Docter Germinar f/9 240mmW MC
    4. SK Tele-Arton 240mm f/5.6 SC

    * That's not a typo. This lens is in fact multi-coated, which of course isn't how they were produced. I've had this lens for years, but for some reason, never got around to using it. The results for the 270 G-Claron appear clearly to be on par with the Germinar which does have modern MC from the factory. Please excuse the forgettable compositions, and down and dirty scans. I was out shooting with my friend, and wanted to quickly take advantage of the sun that came out, to utilise some potential for lens flare. All lenses, except the 355mm G-Claron, had lens hoods on, with about 3/4 sunlight across their fronts. So, the 355 G-Claron clearly suffered the most from flare. The Tele-Arton shows lower contrast, which is to be expected for a SC lens, but doesn't seem to suffer too much from flare.

    I've got a couple older lenses, in barrels, that I'm going to try next: a Ross 14.5"/8.5" Combinable uncoated, and a Cooke 8.5" process lens SC.

    Any thoughts? I'd like to hear what others think.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails G-Claron 355mm f-9.jpg   G-Claron 270mm f-9 MC.jpg   Docter Geminar-W 240mm f-9 MC.jpg   Tele-Arton 240mm f-5.6 SC.jpg  

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.,
    Posts
    47

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    So, here are two images I made using these lenses. The Tele-Arton, was shot on a Linhof Tech V, and the landscape was made with my old Agfa-Ansco 8x10 wood field camera. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Rodney w-Tele-Arton 240mm.jpg 
Views:	48 
Size:	40.5 KB 
ID:	146399 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Geminar 240mm W.jpg 
Views:	44 
Size:	92.6 KB 
ID:	146400

  3. #3
    Lachlan 717
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,591

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    Not sure why you included the 355mm due to its a) approx. 50% longer focal length and b) lack of lens hood.

    Same with the Tele-Arton, if all of these were shot wide open, given its an f5.5*, not f9.

    Just seems too many variables. Perhaps you could clarify what were you actually trying to compare?
    Lachlan.

    You miss 100% of the shots you never take. -- Wayne Gretzky

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.,
    Posts
    47

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    First, I overlooked saying that I shot at f/16 across the board. Sorry for any confusion. Second, my reason for doing this, as I said: "...looking at what difference the presence of coatings makes." , and I'd never used one these lenses before.(ie. the multi-coated 270mm G-Claron) I don't think there were too many variables. The only one was with the 355 G-Claron, and it definitely showed a marked increase in flare/lower contrast, due to the lack of a lens hood. Also forgot to mention that the 355mm Claron had been used with an internal layer of haze, for many years, and I've very recently had it cleaned away. While the other lenses had hoods, I ensured that they received direct sunlight falling across at least half of the front surfaces. I'm not trying to enact the scientific method here. I just wanted to bring a mix of lenses together for a quick performance comparison. Obviously, what the close-up portrait shows, is that under controlled light, a mid 60's SC lens like the T-Arton, will perform extremely well.

  5. #5
    Mark Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Stuck inside of Tucson with the Neverland Blues again...
    Posts
    6,268

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    The difference between coated and uncoated lenses is contrast, especially in the shadows. The difference between single-coated and multi-coated lenses is negligible.
    "I love my Verito lens, but I always have to sharpen everything in Photoshop..."

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Forest Grove, Ore.
    Posts
    4,675

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    The results from the 355mm G-Claron provide encouragement to always use a lens hood.

    Do you know how it happened that you ended up with an MC G-Claron?

  7. #7
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,338

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    Not an objective test because the 355 G has a staggeringly huge image circle compared to the others, so a lot of extra light contributing to flare unrelated to the
    coating method per se. You should compare them apples to apples per focal length, in other words, a conventional 240 G-Claron. They are not particularly flare
    prone, even though single-coated.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.,
    Posts
    47

    Re: An interesting lens comparison test

    Do you know how it happened that you ended up with an MC G-Claron?[/QUOTE]

    Yes. Years ago, I sent it off to Arax, in the Ukraine, to be re-assesed for multi-coating. The lens surfaces were originally covered with many very fine micro scratches, likely due to shabby lens cleaning. Arax disassembled the elements, re-polished & re-coated them, and put it back to pristine condition,...but now with multi coating. IIRC, it wasn't terribly expensive either.

Similar Threads

  1. Lens Comparison
    By Greg Liscio in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17-Jul-2009, 16:58
  2. Lens Comparison Test
    By OldBikerPete in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2-Jan-2007, 20:34
  3. Interesting comparison between 4x5 and digital
    By Dan Wells in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 6-Mar-2005, 07:06
  4. Graded Paper Comparison Test
    By Bruce Pollock in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-Dec-2004, 12:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •