Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

  1. #1

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Hello

    I'm looking to buy a 5x7 camera that will take a 5x4 back as well, but it needs to be cheap! What cameras are available on the second hand market? What sort of money am I looking to pay? Monorail or flatbed will do, it will be used mostly indoors for alt process. I saw a Burke and James 5x7 Saturn 75 for under US$200 on Ebay, is this a good price for this type of camera?

    Thanks

    John.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    San Joaquin Valley, California
    Posts
    8,876

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    John,

    I don't knbow about the B&J monos., but I think the gray painted wooden flat bed models will take a 5x7 back.Anscos are pretty reasonable---$100-$300 but condition is an important factor. If you have to replace the bellows and/or buy backs you can easily double or triple the cost.
    I steal time at 1/125th of a second, so I don't consider my photography to be Fine Art as much as it is petty larceny.
    I'm not OCD. I'm CDO which is alphabetically correct.

  3. #3
    Eric Woodbury
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,295

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Dan,

    It's because 5x7 is the greatest format.
    my picture blog
    ejwoodbury.blogspot.com

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,237

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    John: With the "cheap" qualification, Burke & James and Ansco come to mind. I've owned both and the Ansco is a much better camera, with a built in rear extension. The front of the Ansco can be easily modified to give you swings. If you shop around you can probably find one of the later ones with two backs in the $350 or less range. The B&J's I've had suffer from sag in the middle at the hinge, with shims that can almost be remedied. They have every movement known to man or woman but they aren't the most rigid things. And Eric is right, it is a great format.

  5. #5

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Are us Brits the only ones to call 5x4 cameras 5x4? I see the Germans call 5x4 cameras 4x5.
    What about 645? 456 anyone

    I like 5x7 for contact printing and 5x4 for enlarging. Having a camera that does 5x7 and 5x4 means one less camera in the house which is why I asked the question.

    I take your point with condition John.

    John.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Besanšon, France
    Posts
    1,566

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Two French friends of mine have found in France very affordable 5"x7" / 13x18 cm monorail cameras on the second hand market ; one is an old Arca Swiss 13x18 monorail (older than the current F-line, rails are compatible however) the other is a Plaubel monorail. Both were less than 300 euros and both can take a reducing back for 9x12-4"x5". 13x18cm was a favourite format for studio work in in Western Europe until 1960. 13x18 and 5"x7" holders are slightly different inside by one or two millimetres but outside dimensions and position of the film w/respect to the camera are absolutely identical and defined by the same standard. Same applies to 9x12 an 4"x5", so reducing backs are identical for both the metric and inch format. With older cameras the only problem can be to find additional lensboards. The friend who uses the Plaubel has machined his own adaptor to 96x99mm Linhof Technika boards so he does not need to chase for a Plaubel board on the used market. Used Arca Swiss boards older style are the same for all films sizes from 4"x5" to 8"x10" and they are easy to machine if necessary.
    So consider either a 5"x7" or a 13x18.

  7. #7
    MIke Sherck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Elkhart, IN
    Posts
    1,290

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Both Ansco 5x7 and B&J 5x7 are fairly common used and either will make a decent field camera. While there are both Ansco and B&J 4x5 only cameras, most of them will take either the 4x5 or 5x7 back. I've owned both; I currently use a 5x7 B&J with both backs and do exactly what you're contemplating: contact print 5x7 and enlarge 4x5, mostly because I got a 4x5 enlarger cheap.

    Although B&J cameras have the reputation as being "floppier" than Ansco, keep in mind that this is a case of "average." In other words, the "average" Ansco you will find will probably be a bit tighter than the "average" B&J. Me, I'm always out on the edge of the curve, for some reason: my B&J is in much better condition than my Ansco was in, even though cosmetically my Ansco was pretty sharp. As my own personal preference, I prefer my B&J: your mileage may vary! Either way, you should be able to get a functional 5x7/4x5 camera for $300 or so, less if you shop carefully. I got both of mine for $150 each, including lens, but that was a while ago and prices have crept up over the years. Truely, large format photography is growing!
    Politically, aerodynamically, and fashionably incorrect.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Besanšon, France
    Posts
    1,566

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    What about 645? 456 anyone
    Yes of course in France we call this format : 4-1/2 x 6 i.e. litterally 4.5-6 ;-)
    Never seen any '645' on this side of the Channel, where did you see that ? ;-)

  9. #9

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    Emmanuel, thanks for the tip, i'll look on ebay.fe postage costs will also more favourable than ebay.com too.

    BTW Emmanuel you owe me a new keyboard I had a mouthful of Chardonnay when I read your 645 comment!

    Looking at Ansco and B & J cameras they seem to be painted a drab grey which is rather sad. If I do get one i'll remove the paint and stain the wood. To finish of I might even replace the nameplate with Deardoff.

    John.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,237

    5x7 cameras with 5x4 backs

    John: The majority of Ansco's I see on the market are actually stained wood, not grey paint. I think that means they are the older ones. I haven't used the older ones, I'm not sure what front tilt they have, if any. The "newer" ones have axis tilts and geared front rise/fall. The Ansco is a very usable camera, the only drawback I found was size (but it wasn't that bad with the bed tucked up) and weight. If the weight isn't an issue for you, it will do everything you want a viewcamera to do.

Similar Threads

  1. Instant film backs for 9x12 cm plate cameras
    By Jonathan Ing in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Dec-2005, 13:01
  2. Roll Film backs have different set backs.
    By Wayne Crider in forum Gear
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Jun-2005, 12:46
  3. Ground glass backs for old wooden 8x10 cameras
    By MIke Sherck in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28-Apr-2004, 19:35
  4. Older Press Cameras vs New Field Cameras
    By Roger Rouch in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21-Dec-1999, 20:48
  5. Graflex 4" x 5" cameras as field cameras
    By Greg Virgona in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 16-Dec-1999, 10:28

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •