Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

  1. #31
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,377

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    I just packed for my next backpacking trip. Just two lenses should do just about anything I need with 4x5 this time: 200M and 300M Nikkors. Gitzo CF tripod, no head, Ebony 4x5, and last of my Quickload holders. Very lightwt and compact. The remaining wt is basic camping and mtn supplies.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    498

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    "I would also like a Speed Graphic because sourcing an Aero Ektar is on my bucket list. But the AE might go on an unused 4x5" R.B. Super D Graflex (circa 1947) that is sitting on a shelf waiting for a lens."

    I use a 7-1/4" Verito in a recessed barrel mount on my Super D and it focuses at infinity. I doubt the AE would focus at infinity because of its physical size that may place the iris too far forward. It may work for closer work. I really like the combination of the 7-1/4" Verito with the Super D. With a Verito, you get a wide range of image qualities by varying the F-Stop from F4 to F22. The lens is small enough to fold up in the Super D too. But a graflex Super D weighs almost 9 pounds! So it is not a lightweight option. I just got back from Italy using the Super D. My Super D, 3 lenses, 4 grafmatics (24 sheets of film), 1 bag mag (12 sheets of film) and meter all fit in a small backpack (Thinktank Streetwalker Pro Exterior Dimensions: 10”W x 17.5” H x 7.5” D). My cf tripod also straps to the backpack. Total weight is still 20 pounds sans tripod.

  3. #33
    fishbulb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    407

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    I also recommend the carbon tripod and a lightweight wood 4x5 as the big weight savers.

    My lightweight kit is a Nagaoka 4x5 (2.5lbs), carbon tripod with ballhead (5lbs), and 2-3 lenses, two usually being the Nikkor 90mm f/8 and 300mm f/9. With film holders, meter, etc. it's about 15 lbs. About the same as my DSLR, tripod, and a couple lenses.
    -Adam

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    I second the NAGAOKA 4x5, (which I bought new in 1975). Even with a 5x7 extender, It's still under 3#. A beautiful little gem, drops quite nicely into a Domke F2 bag.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    515

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    Don't use the hanging bag filled with rocks to stable your camera unless absolutely necessary.
    The reason being that hanging objects catch any little breeze and can start swinging.
    Your better off just hooking a cord to the tripod, and using a light weight tent peg to hold everything steady. A rock found close by is all you need to pound in a tent peg most times.

    If you can't drive in a tent peg make the cord into a loop and just put your foot through it.

    Or better yet, find some shelter in some trees or beside a building so your camera doesn't need any additional downforce.

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    1,837

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    Quote Originally Posted by Liquid Artist View Post
    Don't use the hanging bag filled with rocks to stable your camera unless absolutely necessary.
    The reason being that hanging objects catch any little breeze and can start swinging.
    Your better off just hooking a cord to the tripod, and using a light weight tent peg to hold everything steady. A rock found close by is all you need to pound in a tent peg most times.

    If you can't drive in a tent peg make the cord into a loop and just put your foot through it.

    Or better yet, find some shelter in some trees or beside a building so your camera doesn't need any additional downforce.
    I would use a bungee cord and step on it but don't stretch it so much that it moves the tripod/camera.

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    338

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    In all likelyhood your back will get worse with aging, so you need plan B or start right now with plan B. Rather than reducing weight of equipment now and then again in a few years. Consider Mamiya 67 II range finder with Ilford Pan F in Pyro. RB67 a bit heavier but offers exchangable backs.
    Perform twice daily back excercises, see Mayo Clinic site.

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    323

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    +1 for the Mayo Clinic site. Their back exercises have greatly helped with some back issues.
    Peter Y.

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SouthWest
    Posts
    142

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    A couple of years ago I put together a lighter weight 4x5 kit. It consists of a tachihara 4x5, 8-16 holders, 2 lenses, focusing clothe and a light meter. I can carry this comfortably. One place it really shines is at White Sands.

    Craig

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    near Seattle, WA
    Posts
    956

    Re: bad back = get a light weight 4x5" camera

    Quote Originally Posted by Old-N-Feeble View Post
    I would use a bungee cord and step on it but don't stretch it so much that it moves the tripod/camera.
    Consider a non-stretchy lightweight length of chain (metal or plastic) with small links from Lowe's or Home Depot, and attach S-hooks securely to each end. One S-hook can be attached to the tripod center column's hook (or, lacking that, can be wrapped around the tripod's platform and attached back to one of its links). With the chain hanging toward the ground, it's easy to form a stirrup for your foot by passing the chain under your foot and pulling up on the free end and hooking its S-hook back into the chain. The gap between the stirrup and ground can be adjusted as needed; then step on the stirrup to exert a downward force on the tripod during the exposure. Rocks, etc., may not always be available at the scene to place in a mesh basket, but the turf is usually present; if the tripod feet are perched on rocks in a running stream, you're on your own.

Similar Threads

  1. PhaseOne back on "traditional 4x5 view camera?"
    By Don Boyd in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15-Feb-2008, 10:13

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •