Fomapan 100, 200 and 400

[roscoetuff-Skip Mersereau]

Yep. Very, very nice. Thirded.

[Deardorffuser]

4x5, foma200@160
nikkor w90/4.5

[Ron (Netherlands)]

Shot on Fomapan 100, negative measures 10 x 15 cm:


Country House Voorlinden - Wassenaar 10x15 flatfilm by Ron (Netherlands), on Flickr

[Pedro_fiz]

Nikon s3 millenium with fomapan100.
HC-110 1+31 7'30'' 20°


Enviado desde mi ANE-LX1 mediante Tapatalk

[arri]

I used the Fomapan 100 @ISO 50, developed in Adox FX-39 II
Taken with a Voigtlander W.Z. 9/180mm soft focus lens @f/11

[arri]

And a second sample, again with Fomapan 100 @50 ISO, Adox FX-39 II developer
Taken with a E.Suter "Stella" 160mm f/5 and I used the full open aperture.
The lens has a very unique rendering

[Deardorffuser]

4x5
foma200@160

[PaoloC]

Fomapan 100 @iso 100
8x10
Dev in ARS Imago Eco Line (Xtol based 6’@20C)
Fujinon W300 + green filter

[Deardorffuser]

4x5, Foma200@160, Nikkor W 210/5.6

[Roberto Nania]

Hello to all,

I have to purchase some 8x10 Foma film.

I used Foma 200 and Foma 400 in 4x5 and I learned how to handle those films with HC110 at different lighting conditions and exposure indexes (especially for Foma400 which I found I have to use it at around EI 100-160).

For my work on 8x10 I need the look of Foma400 with even lower ISO settings since I will use barrel, shutterless, lenses and I prefer to use longer exposure times or the Galli shutter method.
I wonder if Foma100 is similar in look to Foma400, is it?
Also, I heard that a good EI for this film is around ISO 32, would it be good or is it too slow?

I use HC110 as my standard developer in 1+47 (mainly), 1+31 and 1+63.

Thank you very much