Post Your Photos Made At Close Distance

[tuco]

... NICE pair of Mamyflexes! ... Best to get some original shades cheaply

I only have one C3. That is the same camera raised and two pictures blended together. I have the original lens hoods too. But that darn 65mm hood is such a net fit that it won't fit over the filter diameter, which is ever so slightly larger than the lens barrel, when I have one mounted.

Also bad news for my 65mm. Once again, on Ebay, advertised as in excellent condition but it has a sticking shutter in bulb mode plus at slower shutter speeds come to find out. I took it in for a CLA. But he said it is broken. The same thing happen to a Fuji 645 folding camera I purchased recently. Advertised in excellent condition but had a broke shutter too. If it wasn't for bad luck, I wouldn't have any luck at all.

[Gary Beasley]

A little countertop play with Tmax 400, 150mm Nikon S 5.6 on my Ebony 4x5.

[Rick A]

Nagaoka 8x10/Wistar 210/5.6
EDU Ultra 100/PMK
scan of print Bergger neutral tone FB glossy

[kenj8246]

Haven't shot anything in forever, it seems. Here is the first 4X5 I ever purchased, captured on Ilford Delta 100 Pro w/Chamonix F-1 field camera.
GraphicView 4X5 by Kenny Johnson, on Flickr

Hope everyone is well.

Kenny

[r.e.]

Haven't shot anything in forever, it seems. Here is the first 4X5 I ever purchased, captured on Ilford Delta 100 Pro w/Chamonix F-1 field camera.

Cool. I didn't know that Graflex even made a monorail camera. What happened to it?

[kenj8246]

Cool. I didn't know that Graflex even made a monorail camera. What happened to it?

This particular one or GraphicView in general? Just supply and demand attrition, in my opinion. The one I have was made for the military, according to my research. If I do my job, it will still oblige with a nice image; there's some slack here and there in the mechanics though.

[Jim Jones]

This is the Graphic View II (1949-1967), my favorite workhorse 4x5. It's predecessor, the Graphic View (1941-1948) had a 3 inch shorter rail and base tilts instead of the center tilts of the later version. However, base tilts did make a prettier camera. Burke & James flat bed and monorail view cameras were probably less expensive (and less elegant), and served well enough. When many photographers were downsizing from 5x7 in the 1970s, the used 5x7 B&J cameras and Elwood enlargers were bargains. That may have been too much competition for Kodak.

[kenj8246]

This is the Graphic View II (1949-1967), my favorite workhorse 4x5. It's predecessor, the Graphic View (1941-1948) had a 3 inch shorter rail and base tilts instead of the center tilts of the later version. However, base tilts did make a prettier camera. Burke & James flat bed and monorail view cameras were probably less expensive (and less elegant), and served well enough. When many photographers were downsizing from 5x7 in the 1970s, the used 5x7 B&J cameras and Elwood enlargers were bargains. That may have been too much competition for Kodak.

Exactly.

[Tin Can]

I posted one recently

LN never used it

BAs New NFS by TIN CAN COLLEGE, on Flickrut I sure like it and keep in a studio case on wheels

[kenj8246]

I actually prefer the aesthetics of the red bellows but, as I recall, this one was too attractively priced.