Originally Posted by
Dan Dozer
For that price, you can probably easily get a more modern 8 x 10 that has smoother movements and may be lighter weight. I have been using mine now for about 5 years and really like it. However, I really only shoot indoors, and if you are interested in landscape photography, another more modern one might be better. Note that I paid just under $1000 for mine (camera only and no film holders or extra back).
About the only thing I have had a problem with is that for big heavy lenses, the front standard isn't all that sturdy and can be an issue if you plan on using heavy lenses upwards of 25".
Doesn't sound like the 4 x 5 back is anything you would use/need. However, one thing to consider with it is that if you're into portrait type of work with the look of older lenses, the lens choices you have with an 8 x 10 camera are much more than with a 4 x 5. The 4 x 5 back might be of value to you if that is the case.
Couple of things to look at (from what I've heard from others) - make sure there are no cracks in any of the wood, and that the adjustments are tight. If any of those exist, they can be serviced/fixed, but it does cost money.
Bookmarks