Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: ULF, alternative processes and the environment

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    5,506

    ULF, alternative processes and the environment

    Anthotype is a very enviormentally friendly alternative process. See http://www.alternativephotography.com/process_anthotype.html

    But don't expect it to give you the range of tones you would expect from a good carbon or pt./pd. print.
    For discussion and information about carbon transfer please visit the carbon group at groups.io
    [url]https://groups.io/g/carbon

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Posts
    405

    ULF, alternative processes and the environment

    I agree with Andrew. Any of the dichromate processes is pretty gentle. I'm currently advocating gum for its flexibility and lack of expense, but environmentally it's about as good as it gets.

    Let's face it, though; there is no way to avoid putting some amount of heavy metal down your drain. Platinum and palladium are inert, but they cost more.

    Carbon, gum and Rawlins oil might be the best best.

  3. #13

    ULF, alternative processes and the environment

    Thank you all! Lots of info to sort through in your comments. The quality of the responses in this forum never ceases to impress me...

  4. #14

    Re: ULF, alternative processes and the environment

    Does anyone here know how to dispose their photo chemicals safely
    for the environment? Please help me on this matter, and share
    useful information.

    I enjoy and respect Nature, and as a photographer and an artist, it
    is very important to preserve Nature's beauty.

    However, being a photographer, we use chemicals that can damage the
    environment. This goes for digital and traditional photography.

    For digital photography, the printing shops should have a safe way
    of chemical disposal.

    For traditional black and white photography, individual
    photographers should be responsible.

    Does anyone know how to dispose used chemicals safely in the
    Philippines?

    I know that abroad, they actually have government service that takes
    environmentally hazardous containers and chemicals from the villages
    (usual examples are house paint, insecticides, batteries, even used
    black and white photo chemicals). Not all have this service, so
    photographers go to local government agencies and bring their stored
    used chemicals there for proper disposal. I don't know if we have a
    local government agency here in the Philippines that would dispose
    photo chemicals. If we can just actually bring the used chemicals
    there for proper disposal...if anyone knows of such an agency, let
    me know.

    Please help me on this matter because I am currently printing for a
    photo exhibit, and I don't want to be guilty for dumping toxic
    chemicals down the drain. I currently store my exhausted developer (dektol)
    in a glass jar. I hope someone here knows how to deal with the
    problem. Let me know how I can dispose the chemicals safely.

    Thank you.

Similar Threads

  1. Easy intro to alternative processes
    By Ken Gewant in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-Jun-2015, 18:10
  2. homemade gelatin printing on glass using alternative processes.
    By ed kang in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-Jan-2002, 12:05
  3. Archival print processes
    By Stephen Vaughan in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 20-Dec-2001, 16:34
  4. Lens selection - Is it dictated by our choice or our environment?
    By Peter Brown in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 19-Dec-2001, 09:32

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •