Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

  1. #1
    Andrej Gregov
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    176

    Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    Hi all. I recently moved to Pyro development for my 4x5 sheet film (Tri-X). I have some IR film (Efke IR-820) ready for development and thought I'd try using Pyro (Pyrocat HD to be precise). For Tri-X, I'm processing in a Jobo 3010 tank following Sandy King's instructions for rotary development (my N development time for Tri-X is 14 min). Any opinions or tips on using Pryo for IR film development?

    Many thanks.

    Andrej.

  2. #2
    Scott Davis
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,875

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    Well, it works just fine for IR film development. Process the same way you normally would. I don't have a better example for the time for it, but if you're using 14 mins for Tri-X (which is the Massive Dev Chart's recommended time), I'd look up the Efke 820 there and use what they recommend as a start.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    grand rapids
    Posts
    3,851

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    Nope. That's what i use.

  4. #4
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    I use pyrocat-hd and Efke IR only if I intend to scan or print on gelatin silver papers. For alt processes such as carbon, no. It's a terrible combination, at least in my experience. You cannot get a decent density range. Extending the development time increases base fog too much. So, what are your intentions?

  5. #5
    Andrej Gregov
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    176

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    Thanks for the feedback everyone. I'll be printing these negs on silver gelatin. It sounds like there's no problem developing in Pyrocat. The Massive Dev Chart shows 9.5 min for 35mm film (no sheet film options). PMK shows 13 minutes. Given my Tri-X time is at 14 minutes, I'll likely develop between 12-14 minutes.

    BTW, anyone have a good experience with any other IR sheet films given Efke is now gone? Would love to hear some options. Thanks again.

    Andrej.

  6. #6
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,144

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    All that's out there is Rollei 4x5 but it barely dips into the IR spectrum. Much sharper and faster than Efke IR though. When there is no more IR films, I'll use my dslr with 87C on the lens. Works pretty good.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Berlin, Wi
    Posts
    1,354

    Re: Thoughts on Pryro for IR film development

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew O'Neill View Post
    All that's out there is Rollei 4x5 but it barely dips into the IR spectrum. Much sharper and faster than Efke IR though. When there is no more IR films, I'll use my dslr with 87C on the lens. Works pretty good.
    Won't hold sharpness against it.

Similar Threads

  1. Your thoughts on digital sensor size vs film format
    By Don Dudenbostel in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 21-Jul-2011, 10:30
  2. any thoughts on efke film development
    By riton mhilli in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-Dec-2007, 15:27
  3. 5x7 Film Bulk Purchase Thoughts
    By Ted Harris in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 26-Jul-2007, 18:57
  4. Film development times for Kodak's new 320Tri-X sheet film?
    By Fred Ullrich in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29-Dec-2003, 10:56

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •