Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

  1. #1
    Eliassblood
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe, ca
    Posts
    4

    Cool Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    Hello,
    I've recently acquired a deardorff v8 and am still trying to educate myself on the new format. I have the option of using/possibly purchasing a calumet caltar pro series 8 1/4" 210mm lens with a copal #1 shutter (my friend has it mounted on his 4x5), however I'm curious if this has enough coverage for my 8x10?

    Is the difference between the copal #s simply which format they're compatible with? If so, which copal is optimal for 8x10?

    Also, when looking at lenses, I understand the image circle is a means of determining if it covers your format, but where do I find this info? Is that what the 8 1/4" figure is stating on this particular lens?

    Lastly, in regards to the above, what is the image circle minimum of 8x10?

    Thanks for bearing with me here... Total LF rookie

    Elias

  2. #2
    Photographer
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Pine Junction, CO
    Posts
    820

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    Click the button at the top of the page labeled "LF Home Page" and you will find a lot of LF info including lens coverage charts.

    Lens coverage is independent of the shutter size. You do not need Copal 3 shuttered lenses for 8x10. I would avoid Copal 3 lenses as they are large and heavy. You can find a lot of useable lenses with 8x10 coverage in Copal 1 shutters.

    The 8 1/4/210mm focal length does not indicate image circle/lens coverage. The focal length is approximately the distance from the lens to the film plane when the camera is focused at infinity.

    8x10 requires a minimum image circle of about 312 mm (see the lens coverage charts).

    I cannot speak to the 210 Caltar lens' coverage. Caltar lenses were manufactured by the major lens manufacturers and rebadged for Calumet. If you can figure out the OEM's equivalent lens, you may find it in the lens charts. I would not buy the lens if you do not know the coverage. You can find a lot of suitable lenses here on the forum, usually from reliable sellers.

    Good luck with the "new" Deardorff. Great camera.
    Keith Pitman

  3. #3

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    My primary camera is 8x10 and four out of the 12 lenses I used with this camera come in a Copal 1 and the rest either Copal 3/3s or #5 Ilex. Sometimes the lens you find invaluable with either coverage and/or optical quality only comes in the larger shutter. Case in point is the Nikon 450M. Fabulous coverage and optical capabilities but what I like about this lens is the fact that I am able to reach around and rotate the f stop bar to close the lens down while I am carefully inspecting the ground glass. I also find the perspective it produces very appealing. Yes, the Fuji 450C is available in this focal length but at a higher price I have found. Economics will come into play at some point IMHO as will the appreciation for the most coverage possible as there is nothing more frustrating than creeping into the image circle if you are using movements. The 355 G Claron is another of my favorite 8x10 lenses and it screws directly into a Copal 3. Could not live without these two lenses as I use one of them each and every time the 8x10 goes on the tripod head.
    Last edited by Michael Kadillak; 2-Apr-2014 at 05:18. Reason: typo

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    La Quinta, CA
    Posts
    423

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    I use my Schneider Symmar 210 in my 8 x 10 Deardorff frequently and it covers fine. It's in a copal #1 shutter. Image circle sizes for the Schneider lenses can be found on their website. My guess is that the Calumet and Schneider image circle sizes might not be very different, although I have never used a Calumet lens before. Also keep in mind that normally, as you get closer to things, the image circle get's larger. So, some lenses that might not quite cover when focused at infinity may cover very easily at portrait distances. You'll also discover that if you want to start trying portriat work, the "antique" lens market for 8 x 10 lenses offers a huge amount of different lense to work with, many of them won't have shutters on them. If you are going to go with protraits, get aquainted with packard shutters and/or just using the lens cap for 1/2 second exposures. You can also learn to use the "Galli Shutter". Do a search on the site and you'll find out what that is.

  5. #5
    Photographer
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Pine Junction, CO
    Posts
    820

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    I was able to do some research and found Calumet sold two lines of Caltar Pro Series lenses. The first were manufactured by Komura and the 210 was a f/6.3 with an image circle of 270mm. The second Pro Series Caltar lenses were made by Schneider and were rebadged Xenar lenses. The 210 was a f/6.1 with an image circle of 249mm.

    Also, after considering Michael's comment on 8x10 lenses, I checked my case with 8x10 lenses. Three out of four were in Copal 3 shutters so I guess I can say, "I don't often use 8x10, but when I do, I usually use Copal 3 lenses." The fourth lens was a G-Claron 305, a excellent "normal" lens on 8x10.

    Finally, something else to consider when buying lenses should be filter size. Try to keep the filter size requirements for your lenses at 67 or 77 or 82mm. The larger filters are more expensive.
    Keith Pitman

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Madisonville, LA
    Posts
    2,052

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    My Dagors 6.5 WA, 8.25, & 9.5 all cover 8x10 in a Copal 1 shutter. The 12", 14" Schneider, & Artars 19" & 24" are in Copal 3. Use gel filters. L

  7. #7
    William Whitaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    the Southern Part of Heaven
    Posts
    1,286

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    Shutter numbers refer to the dimensions of the shutter, not to a particular film format. A Copal #1 is smaller than a Copal #3. They never made a #2, AFAIK. Copal #0 is smaller than #1, etc. Other shutter manufacturers had similar numbering schemes where, generally, the larger the number, the larger the shutter.

    The lens design (especially the focal length and maximum aperture) dictates which shutter is appropriate. Faster lenses necessarily have larger diameters and, thus, require larger shutters. Longer lenses, too, in general require larger shutters for a given speed. As format size grows, so does the focal length requirement. Hence lenses for 8x10 and larger often require lenses that are physically too big to fit in a Copal #1. Certainly if you find yourself enamored of old portrait lenses (as many of us here are), you'll quickly find that conventional timed shutters are no longer even an option.

    As others who have posted before me, I am not familiar with the Caltar lens you are considering. But I will add that a 210mm lens on 8x10 is pretty wide, roughly approximating a 28mm lens on a 35mm camera. You might want to start with something closer to "normal", which for 8x10 would be 12 or 14 inches (300 or 360mm). There are lots of lenses out there, for sale both on this forum and Ebay. Search this forum and you'll find many threads relating to lenses for 8x10.

  8. #8
    Eliassblood
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Lake Tahoe, ca
    Posts
    4

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    Thanks, fellas. Very helpful info.
    I was able to try it out and it turns out the 210mm in question does vignette a little bit when focused at infinity. I don't mind the look, but I'll most likely pass on it. If any of you have any decent lenses in the normal range with a shutter, or can point me in the right direction, I'm most interested in purchasing one.

    Elias.

  9. #9
    come to the dark s(l)ide..... Carsten Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Australia at the moment
    Posts
    468

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    As already pointed out, this is a great start: http://www.largeformatphotography.in.../LF8x10in.html
    There are also various blogs, tables, the lens vademecum etc. that deal with vintage glass.
    http://www.jeffbridges.com/perception.html "Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you are right."

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    756

    Re: Deardorff v8 and copal shutter question

    Quote Originally Posted by Will Whitaker View Post
    They never made a #2, AFAIK.
    That is really going to confuse my 355mm f9 Repro-Claron, and likely some older 240 Symmar convertibles as to what are they really mounted in...

    Compur 2 were discontinued some time ago, although I do have a spare for the 355...

Similar Threads

  1. Question about COPAL Shutter
    By RTucker in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Jan-2012, 14:45
  2. Copal 0 shutter question
    By Eugene Homme in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21-Oct-2011, 15:02
  3. copal 3 shutter question
    By Joe Forks in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2-Dec-2010, 09:23
  4. Copal Shutter question
    By edhaeuser in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 9-Dec-2008, 05:42
  5. copal #0 shutter question
    By mark_5047 in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 9-Jan-2005, 12:31

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •