Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 167

Thread: Film test results

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    503

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post
    Mario, I'd be very cautious before choosing EI 160 for a 100-speed film.
    Yes, Bill, I know. That's why I don't want to go any further with the testing until I'm certain I got it right.

    So, Bill, what do you suggest I do? I don't want to keep experimenting with this film because it is not cheap, so I want to make sure that the next time I test, I get it right. My professor in a zone system class I took a while back used a Zone II method (as opposed to Ansel's zone I method) of testing.

    So what could I have done wrong? Did I develop too long? However, that's what Ilford recommends for this film/developer/temperature combination. I thought that was the starting point of any zone testing: the recommended time for the combination.

    Hmmm? What to do?

    Thanks.
    --Mario

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    503

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin J. Kolosky View Post
    1. place a black card in shade
    2. meter it
    3. close down 4 stops (zone 1)
    4. focus at infinity
    5. make the exposure
    6. develop normally
    7. read the negative on the densitometer
    8. note where the reading is in relation to film base plus fog
    9. If not .10 above interpolate by 1/3 stops (remembering that .30 on densitometer equals 1 stop - exposure is recorded in terms logarithms and the log of 2 is .30)
    This sounds like the testing I did.
    --Mario

  3. #23
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin J. Kolosky View Post
    1. place a black card in shade
    2. meter it
    3. close down 4 stops (zone 1)
    Solid black is Zone 0, not Zone 1.

    If you make that correction, the OP's speed works out to be 80, not 160.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  4. #24
    8x10, 5x7, 4x5, et al Leigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    5,454

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post
    Hi Leigh,
    I'd be very cautious before choosing EI 160 for a 100-speed film.
    Hi Bill,

    I would be suspicious also.

    That's why I made the correction in post #23, which puts the ASA right where it belongs at 80.

    However, as I said earlier, the only real test is to go out and shoot stuff, and evaluate the results.

    - Leigh
    If you believe you can, or you believe you can't... you're right.

  5. #25
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,749

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by macandal View Post
    This sounds like the testing I did.
    If everything checks out your personal EI is what it is. You, of course, did not do an ISO test. The reason one tests for EI is to take into account the way you meter and slow shutters, and meters that are off etc.

    I'd just double check it with your next batch of film before you do your development tests. That is, shoot a few different uniform objects in different lighting conditions and place them on zone I. See that you densities are still around 0.1 log d on the processed film.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    Posts
    1,710

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    Solid black is Zone 0, not Zone 1.

    If you make that correction, the OP's speed works out to be 80, not 160.

    - Leigh
    No, that's not it, anything you meter becomes Zone V.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    Posts
    1,710

    Re: Film test results

    Leaf shutter speeds are calibrated to include the whole bell curve of illumination that happens during opening and closing fully. At f/29, your shutter speed is longer than the shutter speed would be at f/5.6, because the entire aperture at f/29 is opened very quickly.

    Maybe your shutter speed is effectively 1/40 second at f/29... If so, the exposure index you found, EI 160, compensates for the exposures you make at the shutter speed and f/stop combination of 1/60 and f/29. This would be a valid interpretation of your test results. I say you have good test process but the test steps you followed lead to results that are valid for that specific shutter speed and f/stop only.

    I recommend that you use EI 100 for other f/stop and shutter speed combinations when you develop for 12 minutes. If you develop for less than say, 10 minutes, to pick an arbitrary cutoff, use EI 80.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    503

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post
    Maybe your shutter speed is effectively 1/40 second at f/29... If so, the exposure index you found, EI 160, compensates for the exposures you make at the shutter speed and f/stop combination of 1/60 and f/29. This would be a valid interpretation of your test results. I say you have good test process but the test steps you followed lead to results that are valid for that specific shutter speed and f/stop only.

    I recommend that you use EI 100 for other f/stop and shutter speed combinations when you develop for 12 minutes. If you develop for less than say, 10 minutes, to pick an arbitrary cutoff, use EI 80.
    Bill I used neither f/29 nor 1/40 of a second?
    --Mario

  9. #29
    umop episdn
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    144

    Re: Film test results

    Mario, just re-run the film speed test with a single sheet of film and your meter rated at 160. If you get 0.1 on the densitometer, the test is valid.

    For what it's worth, on my medium format Mamiya RZ camera I also rate ISO 100 films at 160.

  10. #30
    Kevin Kolosky
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Posts
    791

    Re: Film test results

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    Solid black is Zone 0, not Zone 1.

    If you make that correction, the OP's speed works out to be 80, not 160.

    - Leigh
    solid black is film base plus fog. zone 1 is .10 above film base plus fog. Thus, solid black is zone 0, and zone 1 is .10 above film base plus fog, and is the speed point for a determination of the ISO speed. Basically, zone 1 is about 1/3 of a stop above film base plus fog, although down on the toe the film doesn't behave in a linear fashion. (you'd need calculus to calculate the derivative instead of a linear slope)

    closing down from zone 5 (assuming the meter is properly calibrated for a true middle gray and one is using a 10 zone system) for 4 stops is 4, 3, 2, 1. Zone 1.

Similar Threads

  1. Aardenburg archival test results....?
    By Kirk Gittings in forum Digital Hardware
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 26-Sep-2010, 10:27
  2. Film Test Results
    By Tony Flora in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 6-Oct-2008, 11:24
  3. Some lightfastness test results
    By paulr in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-Aug-2006, 09:48
  4. Rollei infrared film test results
    By Jonathan Brewer in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2006, 22:35

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •