Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Phillips Explorer Back Question

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Nairobi, Kenya
    Posts
    10

    Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Hi, was the Explorer 8x10 ever made with a rotating back? I'm sure I'm not the only one who has seen something tempting.

    Thanks!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    133

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    As far as I know the explorer never came with a rotating back. The compact was the model with the rotating back.

  3. #3
    Tri Tran's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Montreal , Canada. Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    1,434

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    The Explorer doesn't come with the rotary back. Dick designed this particular model dedicated for landscape field camera . However you can flip the camera side way if you want the portrait shot. It's super light weight is under 6lbs. Or just use it as handheld point and shoot LF as I did a few hyperfocal shot in Halong Bay, Vietnam.

  4. #4
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,388

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    The correct term is "reversible" back. A rotating back is something else and fairly uncommon - think the last one of those I saw was on an old 4X5/5X7 'Dorff "Special". But Dick Phillips designed that particular model as "horizontal only" to keep the wt way way down. Shooting vertical with one would certainly be clumsy.
    I suppose it could be modified.

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,652

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    No, it wasn't. The eBay lot you're looking at is mis-identified. I'd guess it's an early Compact II.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Nairobi, Kenya
    Posts
    10

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Many thanks for the answers. Is there any reason to shy away from an early Compact II model versus a later one?

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,652

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Quote Originally Posted by nm39131 View Post
    Many thanks for the answers. Is there any reason to shy away from an early Compact II model versus a later one?
    Not if it's in good condition.

    Taking a close look at the pictures in that listing, the front standard seems to have a somewhat more complex construction than you see in Dick's other cameras, including later production of the Compact II. I wonder whether it was an experiment he tried in just a few cameras. From the looks of it I wonder whether it may allow control of tilt independently from rise - in most of Dick's cameras they're secured by the same knob. Don't count on it, though - I'm guessing here.

    Also, as noted in the description, this camera is equipped with a lensboard reducing adapter to accept Canham (and possibly Toyo field) lens boards. You should be able to pop that out and use Sinar/Horseman view boards as the camera was originally designed for.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,804

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Oren Grad View Post
    ...I wonder whether it was an experiment he tried in just a few cameras. From the looks of it I wonder whether it may allow control of tilt independently from rise - in most of Dick's cameras they're secured by the same knob...
    Yes, it does appear to provide independent control of front rise and tilt. However, I'm guessing that, since it's nekkid aluminum, someone other than Dick might have modified the camera. I suppose we could always ask Dick.

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    8,652

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    However, I'm guessing that, since it's nekkid aluminum, someone other than Dick might have modified the camera.
    I think you're right. The uprights don't look like Dick's, and whoever did it also replaced the usual swing-up lensboard retainer blade with a more traditional slide-retainer. I don't think that's an improvement.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Posts
    3,804

    Re: Phillips Explorer Back Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    ...I'm guessing that, since it's nekkid aluminum, someone other than Dick might have modified the camera. I suppose we could always ask Dick.
    I did send Dick a message, including a link to the auction, asking about that front standard. He replied a little while ago confirming he had nothing to do with the modification. He added that, in his opinion, the seller should have black anodized the aluminum before listing the camera.

Similar Threads

  1. Phillips Explorer models
    By Jimmy Peguet in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 29-Apr-2008, 09:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •