Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 52

Thread: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

  1. #21
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,630

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by BetterSense View Post
    Being a noob to proper photo tripods,it seems odd to me that these don't have any struts running between the legs and the center column, and that the legs are just one piece. Having never dealt with them in person, the lack of triangles in the design just seems flimsy, but maybe the tolerances and build quality make it ok. Still, BH says of the 055 "ideal for 35mm and light medium format cameras".
    Manfrotto and Tiltall are both good brands of tripod that don't need struts. The legs are sufficiently rigid and the hinge tolerances are good. If you think about the physics in terms of load vectors, the struts would basically reduce side-side slop in the center column if the legs are stable by 50%, and if the legs are stamped aluminum rather than steel (like a cheap walmart video tripod) they are more susceptible to rotational torque than a round tube leg (which can handle torque like a driveshaft). So if you have a cheap tripod with less stable stamped legs and a sloppy column, the struts don't do much for stability but might reduce warranty claims and returns from people snapping legs off the tripod like legs off a crab or lobster.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Buy a used Tiltall for your Speed Graphic and RB67.

    Buy a used Majestic for your monorail.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,142

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill_1856 View Post
    Don't buy a NEW Tiltall -- get a used one made by Leitz.
    Leitz or Marchioni (Marchioni is the ur-Tiltall), I've had both and they're of equal quality with some very small detail differences.
    One man's Mede is another man's Persian.

  4. #24
    jp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    5,630

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Leitz is anodized which is a little more corrosion resistant but less pretty than the polished Marchioni.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    561

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    If you want a bigger Bogen than the 3021 look at a 3036. Heavy but has a lot of height adjustment. They should be fairly cheap on the used market.

  6. #26
    PureQuill Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    57

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I strongly recommend the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 (now called the 055, I think) legs. They are the perfect match for the 3047 head. It is a classic and very common tripod setup for LF.

    You see every piece of gear has its fans. I have a 3047 head that I really like the 3021 not so much see this thread why....
    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...an-3021-tripod
    Pure Quill is an old New England expression meaning “The genuine article...the real thing, authentic, or not phony”

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sonora, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by PureQuill Photo View Post
    I strongly recommend the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 (now called the 055, I think) legs. They are the perfect match for the 3047 head. It is a classic and very common tripod setup for LF.

    You see every piece of gear has its fans. I have a 3047 head that I really like the 3021 not so much see this thread why....
    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...an-3021-tripod

    ...but, to be fair, that is an ancient 3021. They have not had that style of leg clamp for years. The new ones are much better.

  8. #28
    PureQuill Photo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    57

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by BradS View Post
    ...but, to be fair, that is an ancient 3021. They have not had that style of leg clamp for years. The new ones are much better.
    Fair enough I cant speak for the new 3021’s my only experience is with the one I own.
    Hopefully they have fixed the lever problems I have experienced with the redesign used now.
    Cheers
    PQ
    Pure Quill is an old New England expression meaning “The genuine article...the real thing, authentic, or not phony”

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,856

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I've had a few tripods, and in general, I find light duty heads to be a lot more frustrating to deal with than light tripods. Spend your bucks on the head.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    8,484

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by mdarnton View Post
    I've had a few tripods, and in general, I find light duty heads to be a lot more frustrating to deal with than light tripods. Spend your bucks on the head.
    I used a 3047, if that's what you're reacting to, for years. It is well up to supporting the OP's cameras. It wasn't up to supporting my 25 pound Baby Bertha, so I replaced it with a 3039 (= Manfrotto 229).

Similar Threads

  1. Bogen 3047 QR
    By Curt in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2010, 00:19
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-Jul-2001, 23:43

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •