Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

  1. #1
    hacker extraordinaire
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,331

    bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I have a Calumet cc-401, speed graphic and RB67.

    I've been dealing with cheap consumer tripods and jury-rigged construction tripods for too long. I got rid of it all when I moved. Now I have no tripod, but I do have a Bogen 3047 head and plenty of QD plates. I like it just fine. Should I get legs for my 3047 head, or just buy a new tiltall? Or something else? I typically don't go hiking so I don't need something carbon fiber and I don't have $300 to spend.
    Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do.
    --A=B by Petkovšek et. al.

  2. #2
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I think the Tiltall will satisfy all of your requirements.
    But there are some decent Chinese tripods to be had for under $200 if you would prefer using the 3047 and QR system.
    To wit: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...13_Tripod.html

  3. #3
    hacker extraordinaire
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,331

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Do you have personal experience with that model? It is in my price range, but the last thing I want is to buy another tripod that is frustrating, then have to live with it for several years until I admit to myself it was a waste and be pretty much where I am.

    I don't think my standards are high; I don't care about looks or weight and my cameras aren't fancy either...I just need the tripod equivalent to the CC-401...all the core functionality even if not pretty.
    Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do.
    --A=B by Petkovšek et. al.

  4. #4
    Unwitting Thread Killer Ari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    6,286

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I used to have the larger AT413, and it was on the heavy side, but quite solid; a decent tripod at a decent price, no issues at all.
    It does sound like your Tiltall will be just fine for your needs, unless you prefer using QR plates.
    I say use the Tiltall until you find a reason to need a different tripod.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Don't buy a NEW Tiltall -- get a used one made by Leitz.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Posts
    3,064

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    If you are going to buy a Tiltall you can pick up a real nice used one for under $100.00. I paid $75.00 for my Leitz version.

    The new ones made in China are said to be inferior in build quality to the old ones according to knowledge that I gained from this forum.

  7. #7
    lenser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tim from Missouri
    Posts
    1,698

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    For those cameras, the Tiltall will be enough. It is a great tripod (as others have said, buy a used Leitz version as it is highly superior to the others) for anything up to about the CC-400 series or Graflex size and weight.

    I would not get rid of the 3047 head though. It is my favorite of all the three handled Bogen heads that I've owned and if you ever go to a heavier camera like a Cambo, or Sinar studio monorail, you will be glad you have the stronger head of the Bogen along with a decent set of legs.

    My opinion, you would have the best of both worlds.
    "One of the greatest necessities in America is to discover creative solitude." Carl Sandburg

  8. #8
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chillicothe Missouri USA
    Posts
    3,072

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    The Tiltall tripod was developed by the Marchioni brothers. When they retired, Leitz seemed like a suitable company to take over production. They were also rebranded Star-D and perhaps one other old camera maker. Ansel Adams used one on his smaller cameras. I've owned Tiltalls branded Marchioni, Leitz, and Star-D. All gave fine service. I have no experience with the newer imported Tiltalls.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sonora, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    I strongly recommend the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 (now called the 055, I think) legs. They are the perfect match for the 3047 head. It is a classic and very common tripod setup for LF.

  10. #10
    hacker extraordinaire
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,331

    Re: bogen 3047 vs. tiltall

    Quote Originally Posted by BradS View Post
    I strongly recommend the Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 (now called the 055, I think) legs. They are the perfect match for the 3047 head. It is a classic and very common tripod setup for LF.
    Is this the one:

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B000UMX7FI

    My calumet is the long-rail model, which I sometimes use for macro, so it can get a bit tippy. After looking at pictures of the tiltall online, I'm leaning toward something sturdier to go with my 3047 head. Unfortunately I have no opportunity to look at tripod legs in person and the model numbers and specs are confusing. There aren't many camera stores around here and those only have foo-foo tripods.
    Science is what we understand well enough to explain to a computer. Art is everything else we do.
    --A=B by Petkovšek et. al.

Similar Threads

  1. Bogen 3047 QR
    By Curt in forum Cameras & Camera Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-Aug-2010, 00:19
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-Jul-2001, 23:43

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •