I have sitting in front of me (I was going to say "in my hands" but there's no way I could be typing and holding this lens at the same time) a 520mm f/10 Rodenstock Apo-Ronar. I got this lens when I purchased a 480mm APO Nikkor and the seller tossed this one in with a note that the rear element needed a cleaning.
Well, I don't think I'll be able to clean the rear element, as the problem with it isn't dirt on the surface but rather pits in the glass. Lots of them. It looks to me as if this lens was caught in a sandblasting. What first appears as white spots on the glass are revealed on further investigation to be pits into the surface of the glass. There is a small section of the glass near one edge that escaped the damage (as if it had been shielded from whatever happened to the rest of the lens surface by whatever piece of equipment the lens was mouned on).
Without even mounting this lens I can already tell that these are not the types of imperfections that sellers love to say, "...won't affect image quality." In fact, I'm quite sure this much damage will act as a destroyer of contrast.
So, short of use as a paperweight (with great conversational value), is it worth trying to do anything else with this lens? It's too unweildy to mount in a shutter without great cost, so I'm not really looking for a solution that involves spending much money such as having the rear element replaced. But is it worth trying to fill in the pits with india ink (a supply I have on hand for my calligraphy work)? If so, just how does one go about filling so many small pits without blackening the rest of the lens?
I know this seems like a question best answered by, "Hey, you've got a nice doorstop there.", but I don't want to miss anything obvious before I write this one off.
Thanks in advnace for your help.
Bookmarks