Starting to learn about Rodinal 1:100 stand development. This is TriX400. Previous attempts here have been blown out in the highlights. Scanned from Ilford print.
Starting to learn about Rodinal 1:100 stand development. This is TriX400. Previous attempts here have been blown out in the highlights. Scanned from Ilford print.
Haystack Rock with Dead Tree, Oregon by Austin Granger, on Flickr
Haystack Rock with Slabs, Oregon by Austin Granger, on Flickr
Haystack Rock with Sign, Oregon by Austin Granger, on Flickr
I've had similar problems using Rodinal and Tri-X at 1:100. It might have been a temperature issue, but I never did a scientific test to find out.
Private Jetty, Noosa Afternoon
Gelatin-silver photograph on Agfa MCC 111 VC FB photographic paper, image size 18.5cm diameter, from a 120 format Tmax 100 negative exposed in a Seagull 4A-103A twin lens reflex camera fitted with a Marexar Ultrawider fish-eye auxiliary lens and a #25 red filter.
Photography:first utterance. Sir John Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society. "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..".
That's true. There's more on the Rodinal-developed film that a digital scan would be able to recover, compared to this scan of a print. So a digital print would probably be a better image if I wanted to direct my life down the digital path. I am pleased with this, however, because it allows me to get a decent image under a circumstance where HC-110-development would have been hopelessly blown out, even with pull-processing.
If we ever see the sun again, I've got some coastal trees that I want to re-visit with my Rollei i.r. film and use this development again.
Another image from the same excursion:
Bookmarks