Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

  1. #11
    sepiareverb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NEK | VT
    Posts
    195

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    2, 7, 8.

    Your milage may vary.

  2. #12
    A.K.A Lucky Bloke ;-)
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL, USA
    Posts
    660

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    Keep 1, 2, and 7. Buy a 150mm apo symmar.

  3. #13
    Les
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ex-Seattlelite living in PNW
    Posts
    1,235

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    Sell everything and get 3 XL's. Seriously tho, why not wide, medium (portrait) and bit of a tele....that's what I'd do. You still may need a macro (?).

    Les

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    4,589

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    You can't be too rich or too thin, or have too many lenses.
    The only downside is in keeping all those shutters working.
    Wilhelm (Sarasota)

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sonora, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    you don't have too many lenses...I'd say you have too few cameras!

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    28

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    The best photographers always confined their equipment to the absolutely necessary.
    Since I guess you belong to them I suggest to keep

    1. Rodenstock Grandagon N 90mm
    4. Rodenstock Sinaron S 135mm
    7. Schneider APO Symmar S 210mm

    Cheers, Mat

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    6,254

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sekundogenitur View Post
    The best photographers always confined their equipment to the absolutely necessary. ....

    Cheers, Mat
    I cannot agree with this statement. It may be true that confining yourself to a single lens is a good idea for one session or project is likely to produce a good result.

    Personally, I would describe you present range of lenses as very limited - they are modern lenses with similar characteristics. I realize that if you are using the graflex with cams, then there isn't much incentive to use "odd" focal lengths. I would keep a couple of these lenses and try out some older types that would give more variation in your "weaponry".

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    28

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven Tribe View Post
    I cannot agree with this statement. It may be true that confining yourself to a single lens is a good idea for one session or project is likely to produce a good result.
    Please let me explain. Experienced people know what they will do and they know how. Often this will lead to a strict confimement in the equipment.
    But there may be others who also know what to do and they know that they need a wider range of lenses. A large equipment is nor necessarily a beginners problem :-)
    I only use two lenses (90 and 135) and do not have the impression to miss anything. In fact, 135 mm will cover 80 % of the photos taken.

    Mat

  9. #19

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ajman - U.A.E
    Posts
    703

    Re: Too Many Lenses - What Would You Keep?

    So for 2XYmm FL, which one is mostly used say for portraits and some close-ups on 4x5?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 6-Mar-2000, 18:28

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •