2, 7, 8.
Your milage may vary.
2, 7, 8.
Your milage may vary.
Keep 1, 2, and 7. Buy a 150mm apo symmar.
Sell everything and get 3 XL's. Seriously tho, why not wide, medium (portrait) and bit of a tele....that's what I'd do. You still may need a macro (?).
Les
You can't be too rich or too thin, or have too many lenses.
The only downside is in keeping all those shutters working.
Wilhelm (Sarasota)
you don't have too many lenses...I'd say you have too few cameras!
The best photographers always confined their equipment to the absolutely necessary.
Since I guess you belong to them I suggest to keep
1. Rodenstock Grandagon N 90mm
4. Rodenstock Sinaron S 135mm
7. Schneider APO Symmar S 210mm
Cheers, Mat
I cannot agree with this statement. It may be true that confining yourself to a single lens is a good idea for one session or project is likely to produce a good result.
Personally, I would describe you present range of lenses as very limited - they are modern lenses with similar characteristics. I realize that if you are using the graflex with cams, then there isn't much incentive to use "odd" focal lengths. I would keep a couple of these lenses and try out some older types that would give more variation in your "weaponry".
Please let me explain. Experienced people know what they will do and they know how. Often this will lead to a strict confimement in the equipment.
But there may be others who also know what to do and they know that they need a wider range of lenses. A large equipment is nor necessarily a beginners problem :-)
I only use two lenses (90 and 135) and do not have the impression to miss anything. In fact, 135 mm will cover 80 % of the photos taken.
Mat
So for 2XYmm FL, which one is mostly used say for portraits and some close-ups on 4x5?
Bookmarks