Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2

    Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

    Hello everybody


    First of all, please apologize my rude english : I'm french.

    It's my very first time posting on this forum, thanks you.

    I want to print images for lightbox. But I can't decide myself what is the best : duratrans or inket printing

    For RA4 process, I have to choose between Kodak Translucent Endura II or Transparent Fuji Clear.

    I don't know what paper I should choose...

    Or I can try an inkjet print ?

    As far as I know : inkjet printing is a bit weak in black area but with more dynamic colors.


    Could someone give me an advice ?

  2. #2
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

    RA-4 will probably have more "pop". Check out Peter Lik, he's done some transparency(backlit) presentation before, and it's pretty stunning when seen in-person!

    Also, RA-4 I'd feel more "permanent" about than ink sitting on a polyster type surface, potential for banding, etc...

    -Dan

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2

    Re: Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

    Thanks for your answer, Dan

    I'm sorry but what do you mean exactly by "pop"...
    (I'm writing from Paris so...)

    All the best




    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Stone View Post
    RA-4 will probably have more "pop".

  4. #4
    retrogrouchy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    832

    Re: Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

    more "pop" usually means more contrast and saturation. But you can get as much of that as you want digitally as long as the output medium has enough gamut.

    Note that you can print digitally to RA4 transparency using lightjet in exactly the same way as making digital RA4 reflective prints. So if a particular image can be realised as an analogue print to RA4, it can also be done digitally.

    I would not trust any transparent chromogenic (RA4) material to be in any way archival, particularly because it is typically installed either outdoors or mounted in front of a powerful light source. The dyes are not going to have a long and happy life that way! Sandwiching it in acrylic (to absorb UV) would help. Inkjet will probably be no better because the truly archival (pigment) inks are not (as far as I know) suitable for transparency use. I think you need dyes for transparency.

  5. #5
    Drew Wiley
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area, CA
    Posts
    18,394

    Re: Paper for backlit : "duratrans" or inkjet printing ?

    UV will be inherent to backlit displays, and any "UV-inhibiting" overlay with only slightly delay the inevitable. But front lighting a print with halogen lighting, a common
    practice, bombards the image with plenty of UV too, as does sunlight. It's all relative to just how much. There are complicated alt ways to make such things, but
    basically RA4 is it nowadays as a commercial option.

Similar Threads

  1. Printing on Duratrans
    By johnmsanderson in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 22-Apr-2011, 09:37
  2. comparitive study of Duratrans and Inkjet backlits
    By comart in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Jul-2009, 18:29

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •