Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 300mm v. 400mm

  1. #1

    300mm v. 400mm

    I have recently returned to photography after a few years away, and am looking to purchase a new lens. I currently have a standard 55mm lens, and a telephoto that ranges somewhere from 85mm to 220mm. I like 2 different lenses, but am unsure of the size. One is 300mm and one is 400mm. My question is: which lens would I be better off purchasing? Is the 300mm enough of a jump from the 220mm, or should I go for the 400mm? Thanks for anyone who responds.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    300mm v. 400mm

    Perhaps you have inadvertantly posted to the wrong forum. A 55mm lens is normal for a 35mm camera - but this forum deals with Large Format cameras, like 4x5, 8x10, etc.



    Perhaps you should post the same question on www.photo.net

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts USA
    Posts
    8,476

    300mm v. 400mm

    Oops - I meant www.photo.net

Similar Threads

  1. 300mm APO Sironar-N versus 300mm Sironar-S
    By J. P. Mose in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2005, 10:00
  2. Caltar II-N 300mm vs. Nikkor W 300mm
    By Peter Hruby in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 18-Dec-2004, 00:07
  3. 300mm f/5.6 Symmar-S [circa 1980] vs Current 300mm f/5.6 Apo-Symmar
    By Myco Megasoid in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Feb-2002, 17:12
  4. APO Tele-Xenar HM 400mm/5.6 lens thoughts
    By William Stone in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-Nov-2001, 21:56
  5. 400mm For Landscape On 4X5 Format
    By chin-fan so in forum Lenses & Lens Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7-Nov-2001, 07:13

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •