The thing that gets me is that it isn't about photography, it's "performance art." His "hair shirt" is walking, pushing a buggy, and using a heavy view camera. The value of the photographs is not what is photographed, but the "performance" around the photographs. I'd much rather support someone who is doing it for the photography.
My view of photography is that it isn't about the photographer. The photograph (usually) doesn't show the photographer, it shows the subject. It's a still window opened onto a frozen moment of time. And so we view that image, and contemplate it. Perhaps a long time, or a very short time. But the photographer is, in fact, forgotten, and all that remains is the image.
Here, it's all about the "artist." I don't know if his teacher was Crewdson, but it's irrelevant. What is relevant is what someone else obtains from the endeavor. Walking a long ways isn't that big of a deal. Over a hundred people a year complete the Pacific Crest Trail. So what remains of his journey? The photographs.
I wish him the best of luck, and hopefully he won't get hit like that guy who was bouncing a soccer on a walking journey to Brazil. (Richard Swanson, Seattle man dribbling soccer ball to Brazil, killed by pickup truck in Oregon)
Bookmarks