Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: C41 developing / negative marks

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    178

    Re: C41 developing / negative marks

    Consider not pre-soaking. I have not seen it mentioned in the Fuji or Kodak C-41 instructions though I see Rollei Digibase specify it. Apparently their chemistry is produced by Fuji.

    Carefully preheating the development tank is good. Distilled water for the stabilizer is necessary. Consider Kodak chemistry.

    I improved my C-41 process after reading http://www.shutterbug.com/content/da...rmat-c-41-film

  2. #12
    Daniel Stone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    2,157

    Re: C41 developing / negative marks

    Quote Originally Posted by spacegoose View Post
    Consider not pre-soaking. I have not seen it mentioned in the Fuji or Kodak C-41 instructions though I see Rollei Digibase specify it. Apparently their chemistry is produced by Fuji.

    Carefully preheating the development tank is good. Distilled water for the stabilizer is necessary. Consider Kodak chemistry.

    I improved my C-41 process after reading http://www.shutterbug.com/content/da...rmat-c-41-film

    Pre-soaking is the only way I can get consistent, EVEN development with no chance of mottling marks due to "dribbles".

    I haven't seen ANY "ill" effects whatsoever, such as: loss of contrast, color saturation or affect on grain patterns and/or reticulation.

    Even "Photo Engineer"(Ron Mowrey) over on APUG has even recommended it for DIY C-41 people:

    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    I use the prewet all of the time and have for over 20 years. I have seen no significant difference in the few tests I did run.

    I have done it both ways though, over the years and find better uniformity and fewer defects using a prewet.

    The colored materials that wash out in a prewet have been described elsewhere in a lengthy thread, but basically they do no harm by being washed out.

    Two things to remember. I discard my developer after use. I have tried reusing the developer and found it unsatisfactory to me and that is why. I also use 2 prewets of 30" each as the first one drops in temp quite quickly.

    Also, the 4' wash time is probably not enough. If the stabilizer or final rinse (which I reuse) gradually turns light pink, the blix is getting into it through a poor wash and will eventually harm the film.

    PE

  3. #13
    Widows and Orphans Beware
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    177

    Re: C41 developing / negative marks

    I would say a water stain. If you haven't had problems in the past using tap water, I doubt that's the culprit. I recommend switching to flexicolor. I know what photoguy says, but Kodak officially says not to prewash. I used to prewash with press kit chemicals, switched to flexicolor, warm tank but no prewash, much better results. I've never used the Rollei kit. I can't say the prewash or not has anything to do with it.

Similar Threads

  1. Best ever 4x5 negs, no physical marks, no scratches, no developing marks/stains.
    By Ed Bray in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 15-Feb-2013, 07:08
  2. Help Identify Negative Marks - Condensation/Developing?
    By timparkin in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17-Aug-2012, 10:48
  3. FP4+/Rodinal marks on negative
    By swookey in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 3-Feb-2012, 15:03
  4. Marks on negative. Why?
    By Tiziano in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 1-Aug-2010, 13:52
  5. Developing my 1st negative
    By Rick-okc in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-May-2007, 07:39

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •