Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    18

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    Xtol sounds good on paper and I was thinking of giving it a try 1:1 with Tmax 100 4x5 in an expert drum 3010 on a Jobo CPP-2. However I’d hate to get hooked on it only to find out that it still has the sudden failure problem that I have read so much about. Has anyone out there been using it successfully, without any problems since Kodak fixed the bad batch and packaging problems? Thank you.

  2. #2
    Resident Heretic Bruce Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,362

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    Has anyone out there been using it successfully, without any problems since Kodak fixed the bad batch and packaging problems?

    Absolutely. XTOL 1:3, Tri-X, 3010 drum on CPP-2. I mix it with distilled water, and store the stock solution in old wine bottles with VacuVin stoppers. Never had a failure.

    Bruce Watson

  3. #3
    Format Omnivore Brian C. Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    2,997

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    Since Kodak has discontinued Xtol in the small bags, I've bought a small bucket for mixing. I use it 1:1 or more dilute, depends on what I'm up to. I like to use it 1:3 for pushing 400 to 1600.
    "It's the way to educate your eyes. Stare. Pry, listen, eavesdrop. Die knowing something. You are not here long." - Walker Evans

  4. #4
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,144

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    I've never personally experienced this xtol failure thing. Probably because I only used the 5 litre packages. When I used Tmax 100 in the past I used xtol straight, 1+1 and 1+3 in BTZS tubes. Tmax 100 and xtol were made for each other. Then I discovered HP5+ about 6 years ago and......well, that's another story.

  5. #5
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    So Andrew - what's your favourite brew for HP5?
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

  6. #6

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    Never had a problem with Xtol at all. It is an excellent developer.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Greenbank, WA
    Posts
    2,614

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    I had some reservations about trying it due to all the reports of failure. I've never had a problem with it at 1:1 or 1:2. In tightly closed glass bottles I've let the stock sit as long as a year and it works fine. I've been very pleased with it.

  8. #8
    lazy retired bum
    Join Date
    Sep 1998
    Location
    Lake Oswego, Oregon
    Posts
    264

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    I've used it for a few years now, in the 5 liter packs in a large spigoted container with a floating lid. I did have problems with the 1 liter packages (now long discontinued). I use it 1:2 with the T-Max films and my biggest problem has been finding grain on which to focus in medium and large format film.

  9. #9
    おせわに なります! Andrew O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Coquitlam, BC, Canada, eh!
    Posts
    5,144

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    Hi Tim,

    Now my favourite brew for HP5+ is Pyrocat-HD especially stand development. I've used just about every developer, store bought and made from scratch, that I could get my hands on. Settled on Xtol then gave it up for about a year when pyro developers came storming back. Tried rollo-pyro ('cause I use BTZS tubes) but gave that up after a year as I didn't like how the negatives printed on VC paper. Went back to Xtol thinking why'd I ever stopped using it. Then last November I read the pyrocat-HD article by Sandy King at unblinkingeye and thought I'd give it a whirl. I was very happy to see that the negatives printed beautifully and can still intensify the negatives in selenium if needed and I can print with an unsharp mask. It's incredibly economical compared to Xtol, too. I'm still using the same batch I mixed back in November. Tim, if you are using HP5+ what's your favourite brew?

  10. #10
    tim atherton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Posts
    3,697

    Xtol Failire - Still a Problem?

    "Tim, if you are using HP5+ what's your favourite brew?"

    I prefer to use rotary processing - I use Xtol for a lot of films, but for whatever reason (and I tried most things) I could never get even development with HP5 & Xtol.

    Right now I'm really getting to like DD-X + HP5 - very nice. 1:4 or 1:9
    You'd be amazed how small the demand is for pictures of trees... - Fred Astaire to Audrey Hepburn

    www.photo-muse.blogspot.com blog

Similar Threads

  1. New Xtol?
    By Tom Westbrook in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 4-Sep-2005, 07:19
  2. HP5+ in HC-110 or XTOL?
    By Steve Feldman in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 28-Sep-2003, 10:37
  3. xtol, is it worth it?
    By Erik Gould in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 4-Apr-2001, 16:36
  4. The Problem with Xtol - Some After Thoughts
    By William D. Lester in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23-Mar-2001, 10:50
  5. Xtol and HP4+ or FP5+
    By scott jones in forum Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 4-Feb-2001, 22:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •