I agree with Wayne. If you want the oversaturated look you can do that digitaly, easier than removing the psycho-delic haze. We all can do with a reality check!
Type: Posts; User: Ken Woodard; Keyword(s):
I agree with Wayne. If you want the oversaturated look you can do that digitaly, easier than removing the psycho-delic haze. We all can do with a reality check!
COMPOSITION! One word one overwhelming reason.
Polaroid aludes to back for this format and even lists some model numbers. Does any one know the backs available, new or used that fit the Graflock back in 2 1 /4 x 3 1/4?
If you can find a fit a yellow filter behind the diaphram will help also. I have no idea why! Perhaps it helps with the blue spectrum.
Apparently you have an older 203. The M stands for M class flash bulbs. The F stands for F class (focal plane) flash bulbs. Some of the newer 203s are in Suppermatic (X) shutters, the X stands...
Good ground glass has never been around an abrasive, they are all acic etched with hydroflouric acid using planar glass.
Amen to the Starret, just junk all the rest. But then I junked all ballheads except for my window pod. I couldn't seem to get around using one there.
Thanks for your answer Steve. It gives me some hope to be able to mount my Kodak/Nagel lenses (which are mounted on #1 Compur shutters) on Century lensboards. Possible? Thanks, Ken
Try trolling Google and eBay. I just picked up some nice Nagle 9 x 12 film holders on eBay. Ken
DJ, I'll bet you my jar of cyanide that photo chemicals are taken far too lightly and far too often the results are far too costly to our health. Ken
Eugene, which ortho film are you considering? Is it Kodalith or the recently discontinued copy film? Ken
Jim, The Getty should, but don't expect it in our lifetimes. Curators become instantly braindead, never remembering that they're just hired help too! Ken
Leonard, I was unable to find any information at graflex.org and I'm leery of posting questions where certain people are such primadonnas, to put it mildly. I've had two seperate responses...
I have only recently become aware of this fine site, you are all to be commended for the content. In my lifetime 4 x 5 has been considered to be "medium format" so I hope that I'm not excluded...
Thanks for the quick response! Would it be appropiate for a pre- anniversary Graphic? How about the same combo exactly, except in a 161mm lens? (It was in the mail when I wrote yesterday) Ken
I am trying to gather information and develop a timeline for an older Kodak lens , can you help? I would like to be able to match it with the proper Speed/Crown Graphic. The lens is a "KODAK...
I would say let dead dogs lie, but that's a stinking answer too.