Search:

Nice, Peter. Have you tried developing in color yet with your new camera?
About using a tripod: I really like the freedom of shooting IR without a tripod, but I will use it when the situation...

Good show, Peter!

I'm sorry to hear that. Steve was always a nice, talkative fellow with me, I know he rubbed some people the wrong way.
But his conversions were always interesting. He made three for me before I gave...

Agreed, so I'll look into re-designing the clamps to have a side-mounted level.
Both the video bowl and all tripods have top-mounted bubble levels, maybe the bowl adapters can get a side level, but...

It's not a bad idea, Peter. It would be better-suited to the Atlas L4, which can reach 72" in height.
So having a visual check of the level when the tripod is above your head is a good idea.
Wish...

Gotcha, thanks.

I wish I had gotten this kind of comment earlier in the design process, it's pretty late in the game to be adding this now.
Since the shorter version L2 tripods are still in...

Those are indeed bull's eye levels on the clamp, Peter.
Top-mounted levels are more difficult to see if the camera is mounted high, but only those will show you if you're level.
I use the card...

Thanks, Sal.

So far I've resisted offering 3-section tripods only because I wanted to keep folded length reasonable while offering taller tripods.
But they are being made for other markets, and...

Slight correction to the above:

The L2 will be offered in both 65" tall and 58" tall versions for the time being.
After the 65" tripods are gone, we will only make the 58" version.

Thanks

Peter,
Yes the legs have a 3/16" thread on the bottom. The tripod comes with spikes and rubber feet.
We had to develop a new rubber foot for this tripod since the thicker 42mm tube is on the...

Thanks, Neal.
I was thinking we already have the 72"-tall Atlas 42-L4, so it would be better to have more of a height difference in these two tripods.
That way they'd serve different needs. ...

I just received the Atlas 42-L2 tripod. It's the most beautiful, amazing tripod I've ever laid eyes on. Truly a wonder among tripods. A freakin' 2-section tripod with 42mm tubes!
It weighs 5.4...

Great show of tones, Peter. Well done!

Tuco, which Zeiss 25mm are you using?

Great lens, great look, easily covers 5x7.

Thanks, Tuco.
The Nash is the first car I remember my father having when I was 4-5.
I mostly remember the hot vinyl seats in the summer.

Isn't it great?
Nice shot, Peter.

Thanks, Jon!

Cheers, Peter!

Had a free hour today, the sun was out, low humidity. Naturally I went shooting.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52083710448_0d86c43ced_h.jpg
...

I pre-wash for 1 minute, nothing bad ever happened. Using the Tetenal C-41 Press Kit (1L).

Ooh. Nice, Peter.

Sweet! Nicely done.

Thanks, Peter. I avoid IR portraits like the plague. Stick to buildings and landscapes.
A good thing to keep in mind is there are no rules or a right way to process IR.
Lately, I've cut out the...

We made a short video with the new Atlas 42-L4 tripod:


https://youtu.be/eOGYsF0W9eI

Yup

Thank you!

Thanks, Sandy.
Sorry, I mis-represent the format option. I have yet to stitch on the GFX, the files are large enough for now.
It conforms to the 6x17 aspect, but it's a sensor crop done in-camera....

Thanks, Jon.

Good to know, thanks fellas!

I like the R72 filter as well, Peter.

I've been enjoying the 617 format on the GFX more and more lately.

One question for anyone seeing these: do they look very bright on your screen? I...

The following are now in stock:

Atlas 42-L4 tripod
CC-100 bowl adapter
QLB-80 clamp
HB-100 leveling ball



Thanks!

Thanks, Jon.
Friend and local belly-filler Rami

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52063011681_c272597434_b.jpg

A well-printed pano is quite impressive!

Thanks again, Joshua.
I'm not sure why I got different-looking prints, but that was early on in my Canon printer experience. So most likely user error.
The standalone doesn't work for me as it will...

Indeed. I'm even more impressed by this winter now, and this opens a lot more possibilities that I previously didn't think were options.

Using Canon PPL worked! The printer just grabbed the paper and off it went.
So now I have an option for printing 17x50" panos (actual paper size is 17x 47.24").
Thanks for all your help!

Thanks, Joshua.
I just re-installed PPL, it was acting up in LR and it's still not showing up at all in PS.
I'm going to try again tomorrow, and if necessary, I'll attach some screen shots.
To be...

GFX, Minolta 58mm f/1.2

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52060483701_234fdf0a78_b.jpg

It doesn't do rolls, so I have to cut a long piece from a roll.
For this size I have to create a custom paper size in the printer settings, then apply that prior to printing.