Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Lets see... it's 11:20pm here in Vancouver... aren't you in the am there? Are you a night owl, Stone?
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Stone stays up later than I do and he's an hour later, EDT vs CDT.
30 years of night shift, is a hard habit to break, for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andrew O'Neill
Lets see... it's 11:20pm here in Vancouver... aren't you in the am there? Are you a night owl, Stone?
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andrew O'Neill
Lets see... it's 11:20pm here in Vancouver... aren't you in the am there? Are you a night owl, Stone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Randy Moe
Stone stays up later than I do and he's an hour later, EDT vs CDT.
30 years of night shift, is a hard habit to break, for me.
Yea I'm definitely a night person...
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
well made. Contact print certainly looking better that scan on my poor monitor, but i like it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
photoevangelist
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Yesterday I've made 1 liter of D-23 developer. Caffenol is nice, but it's hard to see how developing is going and it takes 15 min to develop.
D-23 is transparent and it took only about 5-6min to develop.
Negative looks really nice, with dense highlights and almost completely clear shadows.
Should be nice for kallitype.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7298/1...17897885_o.jpg
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
http://u1.ipernity.com/40/52/05/3027...0f1f27.640.jpg
Out shooting some X-ray in the full sun! Seems to work pretty well. Very much so liking the Fuji Lens!
1897 Ak-sar-ben Camera - Fujinar 250mm - f/45 - Kodak B/RA X-Ray - Dektol 1+10 - Unaltered Negative Scan
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ostrygad
well made. Contact print certainly looking better that scan on my poor monitor, but i like it.
Thanks, I'm trying to stay away from scanning my black and white negatives this year. I'm forcing myself to do more wet prints.
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Quote:
Originally Posted by
grzybu
Yesterday I've made 1 liter of D-23 developer. Caffenol is nice, but it's hard to see how developing is going and it takes 15 min to develop.
D-23 is transparent and it took only about 5-6min to develop.
Negative looks really nice, with dense highlights and almost completely clear shadows.
Should be nice for kallitype.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7298/1...17897885_o.jpg
I think this experiment was a great success! Where I grew up, (Hollywood) cameramen told me that any developer that brought out the subtle beauty of Greta Garbo is great stuff and it's called D-23!
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Thanks :)
Yesterday I've tried another one with D-23 and I think I really like this developer. So easy to develop by inspection and it's quite fast, but not too fast so it's easy to see when to stop developing.
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3780/1...52e2a729_o.jpg
1 Attachment(s)
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Scan of Ektascan developed in very dilute pyrocat-hd. South Lawn Bld, at the recently closed down Riverview Hospital grounds.