thanks. Its usual suspect - zz medical. I actually found it on my own, just by typing search in google.. later realized its listed here as one of recommended suppliers ;)
Printable View
Hi Jim, any thoughts on my post?
Cheers
Raffay
Kodak recommends a dark red GBX-2 safelight filter, which absorbs everything less than 600 nm wavelength:
Attachment 94205
A red LED bulb costs less than $5 and transmits little if any light less than 60 nm.
Attachment 94206
I suggest you develop a sheet from near the middle of the box to see if the imprint is still present. It does't need to be exposed, just developed.
Raffay, first off I like the portrait you posted. Nice composition and the range of tones look good. I have never had anything like what you have on the negative before? I would use a different safelight as well. X-ray film can be different sometimes. As other's have said try a piece from the middle of the box and develop it in the dark would be my suggestion?
Let us know.
Hello everyone, thank you for your responses, I did post this image in another thread namely April Portraits, and one of the member nailed it down. If you look at the image of the box I posted, it has the same markings as in the film. As he pointed out and Jim also, the safelight app I used was not safe enough and during cutting I had the box underneath the film, hence it slightly got exposed during that process, I think in future I would cut in dark, I think I can manage. Or as md99 pointed out I will try a red LED light, maybe my charger indicator light would do.
X-Ray's are pretty common here in Pakistan, I just went to a lab and requested them for a sheet, and the guy there was helpful enough to give me one, and said I can get whenever I wanted to. He has given me the light tight box and has asked me to bring it along next time I want a film, so film is not going to be an issue.
Cheers
Raffay
Who needs to shoot with an ancient lens when a modern Nikkor 300 will do just fine? Green Lat developed in pyrocat-hd in a flat-bottomed tray. Kallitype.