How about Green or Cpl? Thanks SMBooth
Printable View
I've only tested up to Kodak Wratten #11 (green). Stronger greens will most likely work. I would also stay away from red. I got blank sheets. Light orange may work, but I've never tried it.
Attachment 113870
A real boring photo but I didn't think anything would come out on my first try with xray film.
Kodak Ektascan in L110
I don't get why people don't think that x-ray film is not as good as panchromatic film. It is orthochromatic, that's the only real difference. It does not respond to a red filter, because ortho film is blind to red light. This makes it easy to develop because you can do it under a ruby light. It was/is called a ruby light because it is pure red. Easiest way to tell if the light is red enough is with a compact disc (cd). Turn on red safe light, hold cd up so you sight across the bands and see what colors are present. This is also helpful for cutting film to fit other sizes, and for loading film holders.
They are two different things and both have a purpose, just like digital and analogue.Quote:
I don't get why people don't think that x-ray film is not as good as panchromatic film
I posted this over at the other xray thread. Carbon transfer print from Kodak Ektascan. Very diute Pyrocat-HD. I really like how the grass and foliage were rendered in light tones. This film is sharp.
One of those shots where everything went wrong, but somehow I still got a picture.
Over exposed, under developed, scratches, drips, bubbles...
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3731/...a580c5_z_d.jpg
4x5 X-ray
Home-made camera with 13 1/2" Aviar Anastigmat: Red Aviar Camera