Thanks Mark.
I could offer to send you a few sheets.
18x24cm is a weird format though. It's very wasteful to cut down to 4x5" or other "regular" sizes.
That's why I went out and built a whole system around it.
Printable View
Thanks Mark.
I could offer to send you a few sheets.
18x24cm is a weird format though. It's very wasteful to cut down to 4x5" or other "regular" sizes.
That's why I went out and built a whole system around it.
Thodoris, thanks but no thanks. If I did my math right that's approximately 7 and 5/64ths by 9 and 7/16ths. I don't think that's going to fit in an 8x10 unless you use tape. You are right, that's an odd one on this side of the atlantic anyway. sort of close to whole plate, sort of close to 8x10, but I've about a lifetime of projects as it is. The shipping cost from cyprus is silly. If I can't get ektascan or whatever I will look into a US source.
I am using Ektascan B/RA from ZZ Medical. After a bit of a hiatus, recently I've been through 11 5x7's cut from 8x10. I like it and when everything works I'm impressed with it. The everything is me not the film.
That said, Has anyone else seen pinholes in the emulsion? There are sometimes what seem like blank spots. Tiny, not visible to naked eye unless maybe in a densely developed area.
The interest in the Agfa is mainly to have a different source just in case. Single sided with anti halation is not a common thing with X-ray films.
Is Carestream EB/RA UV sensitive? I've been looking at picking up a pair of filters (one for UV, one to block IR) for UV photography. I like shooting X-ray for the cost. It would be convenient if I could continue to do so for UV photography.
I found this:http://spectrumxray.com/sites/defaul...Ektascan-B.pdf
The graph starts awfully high at 400nm, and I'm thinking it might be sensitive to near UV. Can't be sure, as the graph only starts at 400nm. Would it be weird to email Kodak and ask? Is this film still produced by them, or on license by someone else?
I'd say it is uv sensitive, just like most films.
Yes, I have noticed this when I scanned a negative in. Pretty ugly.Quote:
That said, Has anyone else seen pinholes in the emulsion?
Wow! 203 pages in and finally someone makes it clear, thanks Peter.
In case anyone is curious this post is from July of 2013 and I'm still not quite half way through. I'm sorry now I didn't start summarizing all the tips from the start, would have made a great reference. Learning a lot from this thread.
Maybe tomorrow I can put my summary file where it can be seen. It's not perfect, but might help. It's too long to post.